Re: [rtcweb] Consensus call regarding media security

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Wed, 28 March 2012 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F7121E80A3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.488
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.112, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 810KX73H3c-P for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f172.google.com (mail-qc0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C20821E8089 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qcsq13 with SMTP id q13so1075110qcs.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; bh=lEXFhL0bxT9Qe4xIF07L5z8H2FDX56hKlJOle1o8bD8=; b=ej61QHYrU0iPhM8+3PQYti2xJd6UNfIwGzpEPseD/odFiOrLbFYkj79YGHso0NOusA YXSAbKMpd5vwyx6c+A/XtcJ1lvps2mfeG+AJMAobmurW+ALDudx2m77z+PyuJo7mg8L5 bSUCwf2z8Ne+IR+o16FoKJCFEL5kazJ9DT6MRZkVZvplz/agr5uCc9kTgPbdTjBYY03w 8LO1sR1uvZpkfnl5x86xRbiyp8w8jNad2dguxt0Z1I4sjkiCMzV8V7pMDW4ys6XPRNQH ODby6SL0B7/tpHR74XzwKN6wgc/r2P03Bz6jiVhRbJq8wMBNBYQQYaoqRE+N+kgqh/9u A0xA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=lEXFhL0bxT9Qe4xIF07L5z8H2FDX56hKlJOle1o8bD8=; b=oby0eTErXwWTXH4CeKylYTUhQkN7cerLmuYGdDNdMdUgUQgjRti1srBJuejzqHIpfw wRqlnP7mQKmGsLz+Erco/lh4fIBQSLbkAWF3imBkiANegxVp3gByS/4MGUXzr7obVvT5 Z6CdkgcY6i3fhvxdE6O4vixMIZrZEsUlMJws5n94OcxfGSXgAmcRs15UVzzXEsYIjS81 2jhIf6CCBtlq+UBnrdUcEKr4smtO41o7Ixo0n4SLwKM0q91wcobKBeKGmvw0DV0cyScn 8jn/J4G7356q1Jg9dEgXhrBW/vGZiCCUWEuKksrzT+a4+d8L+HlDRylUcDTWDuMDxDmK 44Ug==
Received: by 10.224.98.3 with SMTP id o3mr39646948qan.62.1332966117482; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.98.3 with SMTP id o3mr39646932qan.62.1332966117306; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.161.134 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F7358AE.4040006@mozilla.com>
References: <4F732531.2030208@ericsson.com> <CAD5OKxs6NHha2egNSTumEaHYJ0bB6qu_nfshmBM6dntx2n49HQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F733492.9040601@alcatel-lucent.com> <91F0E66E-A75E-4369-A010-9712FF90258D@acmepacket.com> <4F7358AE.4040006@mozilla.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:21:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-0fjHEUzCDGjx1RD66sCOssHCJrKbJRjmKnZ9P4rSED2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3074d9e2eb734904bc535b03
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlOjs++YTH63R3IL6yU6fg7MH5hiO56/mHIFD5KGE3nr4v9muBKWtHQuCdGMjcvnBSCQucyKiBxG88h60QYwIn1CENvbjk6FqHXQdBwPhbLPhiuVyhz2+k80D3p4kowmdd4c2W8
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consensus call regarding media security
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:21:59 -0000

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry <
tterriberry@mozilla.com> wrote:

> Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
>
>>
>> Actually, I was confused about that - it seems to me it's still an open
>> item whether to allow null cipher or not.
>>
>
> As a browser vendor, I could see adding an about:config option to enable
> the null cipher for debugging purposes, but would expect that for the vast
> majority of users it will never be allowed.


As another browser vendor, this is also my expectation.