Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Christer Holmberg <> Wed, 19 June 2013 06:34 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6828E21F9EC2 for <>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.749
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.499, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UC2LA0+9eBrF for <>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E094C21F9F14 for <>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f5d6d000003d54-c0-51c15103e095
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 42.AD.15700.30151C15; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:34:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:34:43 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <>
To: Peter Thatcher <>, Martin Thomson <>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:34:43 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <>, <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AE500ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrS5z4MFAg6WtRhbXzvxjtLi2/DWr xdp/7ewOzB47Z91l91iwqdRjyZKfTAHMUdw2SYklZcGZ6Xn6dgncGbNnPWIr+KJa8fjgXNYG xj0KXYycHBICJhL3Dp1ghbDFJC7cW8/WxcjFISRwmFHizZoVLCAJIYFFjBLbZsV3MXJwsAlY SHT/0wYJiwiESRz7spQJxGYWUJU4f+gcI4gtLOAh0bnwIjNIuYiAp8Tys1Uw5f/uTgBbxQJU vnrKarASXgFfiWk7zCC2djNLnPo/jxmkhlMgUKLrQysbiM0IdNr3U2ugVolL3HoynwniZAGJ JXvOM0PYohIvH/9jBZnJLJAvsecg2JW8AoISJ2c+YZnAKDILSfcshKpZSKogSnQkFuz+xAZh a0ssW/iaGcY+c+AxE7L4Akb2VYzsuYmZOenlhpsYgXF0cMtv3R2Mp86JHGKU5mBREuf9cGpX oJBAemJJanZqakFqUXxRaU5q8SFGJg5OEMEl1cAYsrB2UmaDCoPKqQZu31MT2atn5/dHOK8v k7aac+1ha77H5zsOdT2bf8/R9JU8P+nsxOW1W64cWLv7YtBVNU73O9MjZv/RrJt65aTL95UB 3/i/n9fwWeue/Pk+OytLXUq2j9JKK61D8qKr/37Z8bchftu9K4aRBjuOROT0miUE6Rs82//h c+5/JZbijERDLeai4kQAzGEChHYCAAA=
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:34:52 -0000


We need to be very clear what we talk about, or some people are always going to be confused :)

So, AFAIK, the discussion is about SDP O/A usage in the API, only in the API, and nowhere but the API.

Whatever people us on the wire is outside the scope.




Sent from Windows using TouchDown (

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Thatcher []
To: Martin Thomson []
CC: []
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
Martin, you're right; that was overly harsh of me.  Adam, I apologize.  I'll be civil in the future.

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Martin Thomson <<>> wrote:
I agree with Peter, except for this bit:

On 18 June 2013 15:16, Peter Thatcher <<>> wrote:
> Adam, I think you're confused.

Adam is much harder to confuse than you think, or than he professes.

Speaking of burning it all down and starting over.  If you want a
house-related analogy, that's not quite correct.  It's refusing to
build an extension because the old house, while legally fit for
habitation, is falling down around your ears.  Since you only need
foundations, it's not that big a job (though I'll grant you that it's
bigger than many people realize, even with that smaller scope).