[rtcweb] Agenda for Friday's meeting

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 17 November 2016 06:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C888212943D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:52:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hs84pxbkCON0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:52:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22b.google.com (mail-qt0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3A5212948D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:52:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id w33so123720713qtc.3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:52:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9/SG5jlPLLzQ20CzmY1VeMRob1XugkM/VvDkVJBRbrA=; b=Zqv0thQGgdu+8uHchIcMVJTOJp99xnPVeO1ZbiLrYN2GaN23I49b2nnHRcHUc0kzVe AJDdndFxgZlbfLIOb3pfqLgqAD3/HCxU9p1EXN91Xl+PpYVl7UilB7lQl5PSxf6Vj/0/ eBAmbMuz+zUZKrFfmeHgvoIUz5mZzZywkJhXMZXOPXJBOFA+eiPyktBA8IKconl6Tkie RAdCg8zeRHdypp/1+LsOLpDTSo+/G9irIiIu+YNFH/7vKYLyZ5/yYUAA0uiP2BGMbsGO /i7iM0THFipmUd0TxtLAu/Fh/FgunWq5Zt89KR3cYQHrPKhaXukDfggf7WojxehbjgSS J9tQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9/SG5jlPLLzQ20CzmY1VeMRob1XugkM/VvDkVJBRbrA=; b=nHIMnnXk4t1QDK6/x2RX3JcsmPqTplP6v9V/XdI792DzMBLO4yEM4Wmby5RMJPghKM IqvswXBLCeNHOJI5Uu+QXSZ0J1cdBt3S2Z7WW7EfXK7J9wtPESoCwkTm2vBVNirsWOHF cAgZst0Cl1lmICVJn+OIj2lj7I7e1n5SALDkQ/SMKeg1OxOkL1g3FvHX9IIxu73knyKi R17wMPpDKmdbo3TZDMj/4u7A7/BYvxHgAQMlVwzbjJwM9VVCYFioPQPW/II8Nro46xk1 881WWCOGf2+zoQMMfgsfXid7AtvphOXH8bVCJ2IMFhiGcrEnGaIFXaiJ5obwKT2ZD953 kulQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02pm4oC8IUynSM4DFJ58c6kGAISucTyGw3xEfdjcvMFiWyhDKuK+H04mF0PezH02/Dq6VY9tdJNlyaA2w==
X-Received: by 10.200.56.186 with SMTP id f55mr829602qtc.75.1479365520894; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:52:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.165.100 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:51:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:51:30 +0900
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMDFXiGi2Kkrcxjsj3BVLai-q4qHU7=EsSxf0fWT7fv0Vw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113978b45db3da054179a03c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/HgYRaPVzQLg3BEtMvmb-tuTYVnk>
Subject: [rtcweb] Agenda for Friday's meeting
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 06:52:05 -0000

The key thing for tomorrow's meeting is nailing down the text on the IP
handling.  We will do that, and then ask for any known issues against the
security drafts, which have been dormant for a long time (we had
anticipated some external reviews, which did not happen, so the issues list
will be small).

I am hopeful that the meeting will be much shorter than the allotted time,
given the small number of items, but we really want to close on IP handling
this week, so it does not come back to the list without a sense of the room.

thanks,

Ted