Re: [rtcweb] revisiting MTI

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 16 December 2014 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526A81A873A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:32:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f7oZwSViymg7 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:32:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2760B1A872C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:32:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id h11so13673080wiw.3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:32:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=HMT5guDEUmYelcdruk0Id8qaSU1GuOqcU0FfiGtWuKk=; b=KNvHvYJYY+xDde/2guqWShnb+TLFv0VIt9lKeQuK6Wp4gl+4IkPwSImC8JqWbvsftE Y8bjlqq2E+2E3sXwMWxKsZ7YHlLX3jiB6Af3JUEa4CpTtkcyxMqS3tuGoSaElVq2q97p 4/LaLK+HKgVijMGrqFwdM8ZER3n3NpVvVt8MfuAVBw8aYBk7xiOIgkI+oYrmXnP//3nN GlwnHH9ZKWLQgfJeQr1KrM2zuBeFu54TObigm1yMBlqSBJnpjY5YHkkIG21XQqsEx1Qr ggn/WDcLwaIzalYuX1fCOtSqgkNNvW8OsY6PdISyN7AJMnY8flV/50TllG5dVlcZWS1H QyTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmrK0/X5K9pr5inb9sI+gsB7f5VKiQ0yg3h/fbAxAAvIENqj1yTOfkCQAmiecOa9/T78kLT
X-Received: by 10.180.84.98 with SMTP id x2mr7434037wiy.14.1418758319962; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:31:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.27.130.34 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:31:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AADF363463@XMB111CNC.rim.net>
References: <548F54A5.2060105@andyet.net> <CA+9kkMDNhRdbzCs9vrqDeD4CoWWK1xS5o0z3jL0DvNpDuLfCPw@mail.gmail.com> <548F5E22.2040605@andyet.net> <548F5F0E.4050100@nostrum.com> <548F5FB8.9010300@andyet.net> <548F646C.1050406@nostrum.com> <20141216150303.GT47023@verdi> <CABcZeBOAfuscG28PMAu8JJ4yAAt1-ohnuqCaeoa+jkpDkJhhpw@mail.gmail.com> <20141216152100.GU47023@verdi> <CABcZeBOykRm1RCupB6905AOikXrcrmeSjE45Yqf1mHL3aed2Zg@mail.gmail.com> <20141216162534.GV47023@verdi> <CABcZeBNDiDyYtv_0vZyO_mGuFi-dn4s0CXEo1agMmRSvsLNR8w@mail.gmail.com> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AADF363463@XMB111CNC.rim.net>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:31:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNgOxDvpSfUhrVrwpnrKNt9HbZDbJqFU3wNhVOac76q-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gaelle Martin-Cocher <gmartincocher@blackberry.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044401b2af15bc050a5a6991
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Hv-54arsZ9NsUCx-38itFYXtsg4
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] revisiting MTI
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:32:06 -0000

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Gaelle Martin-Cocher <
gmartincocher@blackberry.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> *From:* rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Eric
> Rescorla
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 11:53 AM
> *To:* John Leslie
> *Cc:* rtcweb@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [rtcweb] revisiting MTI
>
>
>
>
>    Sean is specifically saying the "trigger" should be discussed
> on-list.
>
>
>
> I don't read this this way at all, Rather he's saying that in the future we
>
> can update the RFC. But yes, we can discuss the trigger on-list. Do you
>
> have some substantive objection that wasn't raised in HNL and/or
>
> hasn't been discussed to death here?
>
>
>
>  I think what has not been discussed is a differentiated text for both
> codecs.
>
> VP8 to be deprecated if failing to meet RF statements from proponents
>
> H264 to be deprecated when not used anymore by legacy services in
> accordance with H264 proponents statements
>
>
>
I would not be in favor of either of these changes.

-Ekr