Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio codecs
Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Fri, 17 August 2012 00:41 UTC
Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3682121F84F3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D3y73hCrAIwd for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc4-s29.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s29.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.168]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7A621F84F2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU401-EAS85 ([65.55.111.137]) by blu0-omc4-s29.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:41:51 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [166.147.94.9]
X-EIP: [3uE+xBWFhcvMf1j20n6iJ0kFfHwGFjq5]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU401-EAS85810F1B7E00B95230D7F293B40@phx.gbl>
References: <9E2843EA-EBB9-40B3-898C-6B5216FAE7A5@cisco.com> <000801cd7c06$2de34710$89a9d530$@us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-Reply-To: <000801cd7c06$2de34710$89a9d530$@us>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:41:50 -0700
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Aug 2012 00:41:51.0555 (UTC) FILETIME=[17952130:01CD7C11]
Cc: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio codecs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:41:58 -0000
I also support the selection of OPUS and G.711 as MTI. G.722 can be a SHOULD; it is widely supported. On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:24 PM, "Richard Shockey" <richard@shockey.us> wrote: > Reading this list is occasionally an act of torture banned by several > conventions ..but since you ask. > > I completely support the selection of Opus and G.711 as mandatory to > implement audio codec's ..however I'm very very open minded about supporting > G.722. It has it merits. It should be totally obvious to most that if you > even think about interconnecting to public E.164 networks the default option > for VoLTE and Enterprise Voice networks is going to be G.722. > > If it is your goal to create globally useful stove pipes fine, but > interconnection with existing carrier real time networks is IMHO a rational > goal. > > As for Video .. for goodness sakes just get over it people. H.264 is totally > implemented everywhere on the planet Earth. So what about the intellectual > property problems. It's not like VP8 doesn't have problems either. > > I'll save my comments about the SDP offer/answer issue for another day. > > -----Original Message----- > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Cullen Jennings (fluffy) > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 1:16 PM > To: rtcweb@ietf.org > Subject: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio codecs > > > At the last meeting we took a hum on selecting Opus and G.711 as the > mediatory to implement audio codecs. If there is any new opinions please > send them to the list by August 30th, after which the chairs will make a > determination of consensus. > > Thanks, > Cullen > > Please note that the following IPR disclosure have been made on these > codecs. They can be found at > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/ > > > 2010-11-07 > . ID # 1445 > "Broadcom Corporation's Statement about IPR related to > draft-ietf-codec-opus-00 and draft-ietf-codec-description-00 (1)" > 2010-11-07 > . ID # 1446 > "Xiph.Org Foundation's Statement about IPR related to > draft-ietf-codec-opus-00" > 2010-11-12 > . ID # 1447 > "Broadcom Corporation's Statement about IPR related to > draft-ietf-codec-opus-00 and draft-ietf-codec-description-00 (2)" > 2011-03-23 > . ID # 1520 > "Qualcomm Incorporated's Statement about IPR related to > draft-ietf-codec-opus-05" > 2011-03-27 > . ID # 1524 > "Xiph.Org Foundation's Statement about IPR related to > draft-ietf-codec-opus-05" > 2011-03-29 > . ID # 1526 > "Broadcom Corporation's Statement about IPR related to > draft-ietf-codec-opus-05" > 2011-03-29 > . ID # 1525 > "Skype Limited's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-codec-opus-05" > 2011-07-23 > . ID # 1602 > "Skype Limited's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-codec-opus-07" > 2012-01-25 > . ID # 1670 > "Microsoft Corporation's Statement about IPR related to > draft-ietf-codec-opus-10" > 2012-03-12 > . ID # 1712 > "Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd's Statement about IPR related to > draft-ietf-codec-opus-11 (1)" > 2012-04-02 > . ID # 1741 > "Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd's Statement about IPR related to > draft-ietf-codec-opus-11 (2)" > > > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Monty Montgomery
- [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio codecs Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Ken Fischer
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… tom harper
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… stephane.proust
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Lishitao
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Paul Coverdale
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Lishitao
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Bernhard.Feiten
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Mandyam, Giridhar
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Randall Gellens
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Randall Gellens
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Randall Gellens
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio c… Ron
- [rtcweb] Consensus Statement for Re: Confirmation… Magnus Westerlund