Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec
Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com> Wed, 05 September 2012 23:31 UTC
Return-Path: <randy@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D774C21F86EC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GUoLJbgdFmnp for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360F321F86EB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1346887895; x=1378423895; h=message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:date:to:from: subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:x-random-sig-tag: x-originating-ip; bh=fU241l+XiIdS8YIccgjJuUC92C3RCZyCMciK8BF3Eq8=; b=TTJ691rrEDy+RJi69N32vxoLUS2urOKppCu8Fm4bcKHeaVRwR8T0ZrHw IayGvksbij5tcWk8R1wn2KlKzg5xu0xRh7HszF+9rVcAZQQdFvPQ4N5B1 xy7L9CFkL5aFY0ls+DkzelO8GGiBYI5ujthFu73OojJNub62XUM/m8U6/ M=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6826"; a="233315208"
Received: from ironmsg04-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.18]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2012 16:31:34 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,376,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="382094093"
Received: from nasanexhc07.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.190]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 05 Sep 2012 16:31:34 -0700
Received: from [99.111.97.136] (172.30.39.5) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.190) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.1; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:31:33 -0700
Message-ID: <p06240609cc6d8e39fb6c@[99.111.97.136]>
In-Reply-To: <20120901061236.GH23434@audi.shelbyville.oz> <20120904210055.GN23434@audi.shelbyville.oz>
References: <CAC8DBE4E9704C41BCB290C2F3CC921A162D278D@nasanexd01h.na.qualcomm.com> <503FC1BF.5020004@alvestrand.no> <CAC8DBE4E9704C41BCB290C2F3CC921A162D2B0F@nasanexd01h.na.qualcomm.com > <5040541C.5020008@alvestrand.no> <20120831133845.GW72831@verdi> <5040CE32.5050003@jesup.org> <20120831151247.GY72831@verdi> <CAD6AjGToznJtNdSzyFbxKhhXQTLTuOWnPutOYDCQCVH_8mRZ5w@mail.gmail.com> <20120901031955.GF23434@audi.shelbyville.oz> <CAD6AjGTN6JTQ50bj-6v2vvw56HOWNA7VmP-BZFwNWiX-c0AAnA@mail.gmail.com> <20120901061236.GH23434@audi.shelbyville.oz> <20120831133845.GW72831@verdi> <5040CE32.5050003@jesup.org> <20120831151247.GY72831@verdi> <p06240608cc66e4862829@[99.111.97.136]> <00a701cd89fc$e681e9d0$b385bd70$@us> <p06240601cc6aa58a7171@[99.111.97.136]> <504571BC.9020103@librevideo.org> <5045CA2B.2070406@gmail.com> <5045F343.9030107@alvestrand.no> <50460FF1.30708@freedesktop.org> <20120904210055.GN23434@audi.shelbyville.oz>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:29:28 -0700
To: Ron <ron@debian.org>, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
From: Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.39.5]
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:31:35 -0000
At 6:30 AM +0930 9/5/12, Ron wrote: > It's not about "forcing Opus on people who don't want it", it's about > making rtcweb actually work for all those people who are serious about > wanting something that actually works. We're clearly not going to give > them that by saying: "Here's some valve-age technology that's been all > but obsolete for decades now - if you want this to be Any Good, you'll > have to figure that part out for yourselves. Good Luck with that!" > > However much valves might be the stuff of True Audiophile wet dreams, > that just won't fly. And I'm pretty sure almost everyone here knows it. At 3:42 PM +0930 9/1/12, Ron wrote: > The question is what is the minimum > guarantee that any rtcweb user will have when talking to any other > rtcweb user, without first needing to sign consent forms and download > optional extras (possibly for a reasonably non-discriminatory fee, > and even possibly trojaned). I'm puzzled by the repeated statements that imply that any non-mandatory codec can't be supported without separate downloads (now extended to include signed consent forms and fees). That's simply not true. Any implementation is free to support any codec out-of-the-box. One of the goals of rtcweb is to encourage greater use of native codecs, and greater access to such codecs by applications such as those running in browsers. These are worthy goals, since native codecs often have better performance within the environment. (Examples include AMR and EVRC on handsets.) These codecs also can be supported out-of-the-box, no separate downloads, no signed forms. The discussion is over which codecs MUST be supported. Since mandatory codecs are required, with no choice, they should have the lowest possible burden to implement, taking into account all aspects of the implementation burden. Then, implementers are free to consider which additional codecs they will support, taking into account the costs and benefits. -- Randall Gellens Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only -------------- Randomly selected tag: --------------- The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place. --G. B. Shaw
- [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Alan Johnston
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Martin Taylor
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Randall Gellens
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Randall Gellens
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Ralph Giles
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec stephane.proust
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Martin Taylor
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Randall Gellens
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Mandyam, Giridhar
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Gregory Maxwell
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Mandyam, Giridhar
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Mandyam, Giridhar
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec John Leslie
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Mandyam, Giridhar
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec John Leslie
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Cameron Byrne
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Mandyam, Giridhar
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Mandyam, Giridhar
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Randall Gellens
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Gregory Maxwell
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Stefan Hacker
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Cameron Byrne
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Randall Gellens
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Jim Gettys
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Randall Gellens
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec John Leslie
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec Timothy B. Terriberry