Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server

"Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com> Mon, 07 July 2014 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044BD1B2807 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 03:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MSzxB85wuQTv for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 03:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2E181B2805 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 03:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s67AML8w022268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 7 Jul 2014 10:22:21 GMT
Received: from DEMUHTC002.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.33]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s67AMIwS010020 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:22:19 +0200
Received: from DEMUHTC007.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.38) by DEMUHTC002.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:22:18 +0200
Received: from DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.5.136]) by DEMUHTC007.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:22:18 +0200
From: "Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com>
To: ext Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server
Thread-Index: AQHPmNFaxlBjIjlaUkagsYjKd7XPXJuSWVoAgAA4q4CAAEDZgIAAB6IAgAAJTgCAAAMggIABSoAAgAA2lsA=
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 10:22:18 +0000
Message-ID: <56C2F665D49E0341B9DF5938005ACDF833E4DD@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
References: <CALiegf=kLtiUKoue=ahXP4fUhLJNNd8vCaQTECQxjK5R7cjLTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxv8s5-FNR-kq0C01H_Ev39cyBs5P__Pd-0cmCXDFYy-YQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPV_iVcSmi+ndDaYY6zX=F7TRoSDFqe5hzJP3-NjZ7Y1w@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=CMAOwVF3=gNY9qrsTfsEwuiwvGZ_1SaS0waOUE83-Ug@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMPyT4y1v12O5pb7Khs2ge0pgjUugrBS0NoK8=SLOScxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmjywprsFvsQg10S0nGw08XhuCAjDrqgx2=ZfV-T6_PVA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBM+ywkbXbE6=fz7Z9kmZkpsqW385kntoXW2RAR1eaWu1A@mail.gmail.com>, <CALiegf=_6je5kqwPETMGmU+tznypJLEnTdvMa2+i5Nae=t9vTA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D3B608F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D3B608F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.115]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 1493
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1404728541-000005B1-787B45DC/0/0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/IrrW-NRUEtEdBMcHAKP7UgyrLm0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 10:22:27 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Christer
> Holmberg
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 11:03 AM
> To: Iñaki Baz Castillo; Eric Rescorla
> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server
> 
> Hi,
> 
> >>> I'm hope not. Implementing ICE-Lite in a server is trivial.
> >>> Implementing full ICE is an overhead in a server. Please not. It is
> >>> Firefox which must adhere to the standard and use regular nomination
> >>> when the peer is ICE-Lite.
> >>
> >>
> >> Well, we're currently discussing what the standards should say.
> >> If we decide that counterparties to WebRTC do full ICE (just like
> >> we've required them to do a bunch of other stuff) then it will be
> >> the other side which needs to adjust.
> >
> >
> > Of course. I just hope such a decision is not taken given the amount
> > of server side implementations relying on ICE-Lite (and the fact that
> > it is not so hard for full ICE clients to behave correctly when
> > talking to a lite peer).
> 
> +1.
> 
> I also we more or less had agreed on this in the past, that ICE-Lite is
> ok e.g. for gateways.

Same here. Gateways connected to the public Internet need to (and often do) implement ICE Lite only.
So far, implementers have trusted that this is OK based on the ICE RFC. 
We need good reasons when profiling other RFCs.

Kind regards,
Uwe

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer