Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti

I imagine it is this one:

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-dbenham-webrtc-videomti-01.txt

Michael

On 26 February 2013 18:47, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
<matthew.kaufman@skype.net> wrote:
> Where is said draft? Hard to know if this would be time well spent if the draft isn't available. http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti-00 returns 404
>
> Matthew Kaufman
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:08 AM
> To: <rtcweb@ietf.org>
> Subject: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti
>
>
> I would like 25 minutes for presentation of information key to draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti that is not interrupted and 15 minutes for Q/A for the work.
>
> We have spent many hours of meeting time discussing the way we were going to make a decision around codecs and information needed, but we have not yet spent time discussing the actually information to make the decision. This draft addressees several very key issues, including the actually quality comparison of VP8 and H.264. I think that spending any less time than this would result in a situation where the WG was not making an decisions with the information available. Similarly, other  people that have written other drafts with similar or different views also need to speak up about how much time they need and that we make sure everyone has time to explain the key information, people have time to ask questions about it, and we can make an informed decisions instead of having to discuss the video codecs at many future meetings.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb