Re: [rtcweb] POTS lines to browser (was Re: Fwd: Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Let's define the purpose of WebRTC))

Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com> Tue, 15 November 2011 08:39 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@phonefromhere.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9FF21F8F59 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:39:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i10-MvghiQS1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:39:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zimbra.westhawk.co.uk (zimbra.westhawk.co.uk [192.67.4.167]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC0521F8DE9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:39:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.157.48] (unknown [93.89.81.113]) by zimbra.westhawk.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D4D37A902; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:51:54 +0000 (GMT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAJUQMjV-0rAbY6MKbTD_vM3PFpuRjFPWnwJ0Lq9rpnAytgeXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:39:07 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FC68587A-7610-4126-B18B-B5FD8FE611EA@phonefromhere.com>
References: <CALiegfkVNVAs_MyU_-4koA4zRwSn1-FwLjY9g_oZVkhi9rSK5Q@mail.gmail.com> <4EBC3475.90706@alvestrand.no> <CAD5OKxu_-+ZRsqpUBkFSj=tYtOKG0pK3JoQTZHwQGMuBCnp0Gw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxuaWJ3SBv+0gac6EQy6-Lsb-LS_SBXk5FqObKy4mN6wNg@mail.gmail.com> <CCF4FC92-D5AA-43C8-A0B2-8041C9B8E1BD@edvina.net> <CAD5OKxs-pWwDBjwAu=mQVWRZa4H_YPpzQ31=0qxUUj-pJOErcg@mail.gmail.com> <A2DFC694-DBDF-4DB4-8DE0-DD638C7AF2BE@acmepacket.com> <CALiegfkU1qhLmhY9L373pF7j9zwHipFfu4mAuY49RDTNL7V5Vg@mail.gmail.com> <C11CACFE-FE5A-43F2-8B61-6ABC9965B7FC@acmepacket.com> <CAOJ7v-3w4t0oYKs+01srAmPGziYt6vVZNOQwbpZ7YWUFZtP20w@mail.gmail.com> <CABRok6mJx+quBzdzRZ8fX774+kj-ABWJJvPB=P7=7R5s=ZA2Yg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3W36MGn+8UDo3C2WWtnzJQ4GcB8qkoXy5zucJxjmF1zw@mail.gmail.com> <CABRok6nYi4tg1wJt=0xbw6tkp8JDT4FEpxgW=Uhovx=j+w3=bA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAJUQMg7RiTb46+fzvMcYAeu5DUct2g8s3X5M5DVQa+mrxfhRA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAJUQMjzuCva4qvtm=jaJY6O2nTUC8CrLdjUbOVUyZTji+Szzg@mail.gmail.com> <4EC1BA6D.9060808@skype.net> < CAAJUQMjV-0rAbY6MKbTD_vM3PFpuRjFPWnwJ0Lq9rpnAytgeXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wolfgang Beck <wolfgang.beck01@googlemail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] POTS lines to browser (was Re: Fwd: Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Let's define the purpose of WebRTC))
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:39:07 -0000

On 15 Nov 2011, at 01:10, Wolfgang Beck wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Matthew Kaufman
> <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> wrote:
>> On 11/14/11 6:37 PM, Wolfgang Beck wrote:
>>> 
>>> If we do connect POTS lines
>>> to the browser, we have to talk about fax as well.
>> 
>> I fail to follow the leap you have made here. If we're going to make a leap,
>> wouldn't exposing ringing voltage to the user's keyboard be of more value?
> I was talking about a hopefully hypothetical system which exposes an
> analogue phone via a POTS port to a browser as sound device.
> Better not give people ideas..
> 

Ohh, can I have the Hayes AT command set and pulse dialling too ? 

I've a 60s rotary phone I'd like to put into service.

Tim.