Re: [rtcweb] How to multiplex between peers

On 07/21/11 02:41, Henry Sinnreich wrote:
> +1
>
>> If anything this is an argument for ignoring RTP and RTCP and doing
>> something entirely new that is actually appropriate for what we're
>> trying to build, not living with crap just because there's an RFC for it.
> Not to forget disposing of ancient SDP as well.
> Use standard metadata instead, since it is equally usable for all apps, not
> only for RTC apps.
Henry, which standard?
http://www.xkcd.com/927/ applies to metadata too, I think.

> Thanks, Henry
>
>
> On 7/20/11 5:38 PM, "Matthew Kaufman"<matthew.kaufman@skype.net>  wrote:
>
>> On 7/20/2011 3:31 PM, Colin Perkins wrote:
>>> On 20 Jul 2011, at 22:15, Aron Rosenberg wrote:
>>>> Another +1 for multiplexing everything together. My only worry is
>>>> that the base spec for RTCP doesn't mandate that SSRC is included in
>>>> every RTCP message type, and thus you could end up with the
>>>> multiplexing layer needing to understand every  RTCP messaged used
>>>> for video (TMMBR, TMMBN, etc)
>>> ...which is another reason why this doesn't work in all cases, in
>>> addition to the reasons we document in draft-perkins-rtcweb-rtp-usage-02
>>>
>> So let me get this straight... RTP and RTCP is broken and inflexible and
>> therefore we must use it, and use it in the broken and inflexible way?
>>
>> If anything this is an argument for ignoring RTP and RTCP and doing
>> something entirely new that is actually appropriate for what we're
>> trying to build, not living with crap just because there's an RFC for it.
>>
>> Matthew Kaufman
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>