IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Mon, 08 December 2014 23:57 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318711A004C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 15:57:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C5rBmBvEwSg5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 15:57:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3684C1A0370 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 15:57:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [33.230.243.132] ([172.56.6.178]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sB8NvHTV063190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Dec 2014 17:57:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [172.56.6.178] claimed to be [33.230.243.132]
References: <E3FA0C72-48C5-465E-AE15-EB19D8D563A7@ieca.com> <54820E74.90201@mozilla.com> <54861AD6.8090603@reavy.org> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD233998AC05@XMB122CNC.rim.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD233998AC05@XMB122CNC.rim.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <63BC3D6D-03A1-41C2-B92D-C8DD57DC51DB@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B411)
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 17:57:13 -0600
To: Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/JWxw4vGb9ohxkoO1rWGAIdpSRzM
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 23:57:35 -0000


> On Dec 8, 2014, at 17:28, Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com> wrote:
> 
> If we decide on two MTI video codecs then we have clearly failed to meet this commitment.

Do you have a constructive and plausible proposal?

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email