Re: [rtcweb] Conclusion statement for Recommended Audio Codecs call

+1

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Burger Eric
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 9:39 PM
> To: Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Conclusion statement for Recommended Audio Codecs
> call
> 
> A different document would be good. No need to to have an argument over
> non-normative text hold up publication.
> 
> On Jan 27, 2013, at 4:14 AM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi WG chairs,
> >
> > Clarification question:
> >
> >> In lieu of additional normative text, we believe the WG discussion
> >> supports the inclusion of a new section on "Additional Relevant
> Codecs".
> >
> > Inclusion where?
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
> >> Behalf Of Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
> >> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 6:47 PM
> >> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Conclusion statement for Recommended Audio
> >> Codecs call
> >>
> >>
> >> We have been running a call for consensus regarding Selecting
> >> Recommended Audio Codecs.
> >>
> >> At this point the chairs are calling this as "no WG consensus".
> >>
> >> We can however note a strong interest in a non-normative listing of
> >> potentially important codecs including a description why they should
> >> be considered to be supported in WebRTC implementations.
> >>
> >> In lieu of additional normative text, we believe the WG discussion
> >> supports the inclusion of a new section on "Additional Relevant
> Codecs".
> >> That can contain a list of codecs which are relevant in specific
> >> contexts, along with a short description of the context for each.
> >> Specifically there seems to be interest in understanding the
> >> advantages and costs of G.722, AMR, and AMR-WB. We hope that text
> >> would broaden understanding of the WebRTC use case contexts.
> >>
> >> The WG chairs
> >> Magnus, Ted and Cullen
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rtcweb mailing list
> >> rtcweb@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb