Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
<silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>wrote:

> Could we please include also:
> All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264 CBP, Theora}
>
>
Added as item 14.

Ted

> Thanks,
> Silvia.
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Gaelle Martin-Cocher
> > <gmartincocher@blackberry.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> If we proceed with the vote, I would like to see the following choice:
> >> All entities must support H263.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Gaëlle
> >>
> >
> > I've updated the wiki to include this as choice 13.  If you have a
> reference
> > that we could use that specifies version, annexes, or any other
> additional
> > detail, we can include a pointer.
> >
> > Ted
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gaelle
> >> Martin-Cocher
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 11:29 AM
> >> To: Magnus Westerlund; Emil Ivov
> >> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection
> >> alternatives
> >>
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >> Sorry for this late message, I was not available this past week.
> >>
> >> It has been mentioned by a few of us that the risks on VP8 that some
> can't
> >> leave with, can be mitigated when VP8 becomes an ISO standard (via
> MPEG).
> >> VP8 has a chance to become an MPEG deliverable in January. I believe
> that
> >> could make a few of us more comfortable with supporting/mandating both
> H264
> >> and VP8 and could change the consensus reaching process.
> >>
> >> Can we give VP8 that chance before forcing a vote?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Sincerely,
> >> Gaëlle
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Magnus
> >> Westerlund
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:33 AM
> >> To: Emil Ivov
> >> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection
> >> alternatives
> >>
> >> On 2013-11-27 12:41, Emil Ivov wrote:
> >> > Just to confirm, this is NOT the last day of discussion on whether a
> >> > vote is the right way to do this at all, right?
> >>
> >> No, but tomorrow a week will have passed since we chairs sent out the
> >> proposal and solicited feedback on the proposal.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > That sounds like it would still be an open question for step two here:
> >> >
> >> > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg09909.html
> >>
> >> As we stated in this message, after the week we chairs would update the
> >> process proposal if we considered it necessary. I believe there are some
> >> clarifications that needs to be done, including the voter eligibility.
> >>
> >> After that the stated plan was to hold a consensus call in the WG to use
> >> the proposed process.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Magnus Westerlund
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> >> Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> >> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rtcweb mailing list
> >> rtcweb@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> >> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> >> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
> non-public
> >> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the
> intended
> >> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in
> error,
> >> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
> your
> >> system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> >> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be
> unlawful.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rtcweb mailing list
> >> rtcweb@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> >> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> >> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
> non-public
> >> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the
> intended
> >> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in
> error,
> >> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
> your
> >> system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> >> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be
> unlawful.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rtcweb mailing list
> >> rtcweb@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>