[rtcweb] Moving to WEDNESDAY Re: RTCWeb DEMO's Thursday at Lunch -

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Mon, 26 March 2012 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCF521F866C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 05:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 98HHLoNQP01E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 05:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606FD21F8646 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 05:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=1296; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1332764235; x=1333973835; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=IdKrM2XTfnTyHwUzSWEHySvJ+14qxT4O23fBN3Mlu+Q=; b=jDHKwyzlWS5wBzXc/iqzOPuKPaLaIv/ycBjlmWprVav4ZGBpQBka8lAv vZqnfj8EEkplSqQ26siHkfqb5yQttDdFj719+LRL4KzLtm8IK40wM8NBe rAnuX4Lh7fzC3MPFD0xIdFSZ3n9BkteTDMXzVnZNj2qygdVahqLttmmt5 o=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,650,1325462400"; d="scan'208";a="133353181"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2012 12:17:14 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-97-136.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-97-136.cisco.com []) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2QCHE4s001498; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:17:14 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <B52B422E-B097-4968-A407-9DB0EA4829D0@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:17:13 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F834644B-5A5C-42E5-8CCA-1027853829B8@cisco.com>
References: <B52B422E-B097-4968-A407-9DB0EA4829D0@cisco.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: [rtcweb] Moving to WEDNESDAY Re: RTCWeb DEMO's Thursday at Lunch -
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:17:20 -0000

This meeting is going to move to Wednesday 1130-1300 in room 242AB. 

This was moved to avoid the conflict with the lunch talk titled "Status of Standards for Cloud Storage" being given by Scality as they are a paying sponsor of this IETF. Instead we will move to conflict with the Cisco lunch talk - I really doubt that Cisco will have a problem with this.

I'd got some side questions about what this was and wanted it to be clear - this is to look at the running code of folks building the RTCWeb specs and gets some feedback from implementors about the specs as well as help folks understand how the implementations matched (or fail to match) the specs. 


On Mar 24, 2012, at 12:38 , Cullen Jennings wrote:

> We will be doing RTCWeb related demos in room 242AB on Thursday 1130-1300. Please let the chairs know if there is a demo you would like to show. 
> There will be no food provided - I suspect what we will do is just run demos from 11:30 to 12:00 and then give people time to go for lunch. The chairs will see what people want to demo and then plan a schedule. 
> If you have some code that might run, lets us know and lets see it.  
> Thanks, Cullen