Re: [rtcweb] (no subject)

as a purely pragmatic issue, some device seem to have SDP bugs that cause them to ignore some attributes at the session level. I don’t really care what we do on this as mostly I think theses devices should fix their bugs but when people talk abut SDP interop issues, this is occasionally an issue that comes up. 

So I agree we need to have a SHOULD on saying where things go that could be at either a session level or a m= level. Session level makes more sense from a standards point of view but m= level might have slightly better interoperability. 

I don’t care which we choose - perhaps some of the people that considerers themselves and experts on why SDP has interop problems could chime in on how important this is. 

On May 11, 2014, at 11:52 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/jsep/issues/19
> 
> JSEP S 5.2.1 reads:
> 
>    Attributes that are common between all m= sections MAY be moved to
>    session-level, if explicitly defined to be valid at session-level.
> 
> We should probably encourage this. I propose we make this a SHOULD
> rather than a MAY.
> 
> -Ekr
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb