IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8

David Singer <singer@apple.com> Thu, 07 November 2013 06:10 UTC

Return-Path: <singer@apple.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE8011E817E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 22:10:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.529
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.529 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.070, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 49wFnfzfwuvZ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 22:10:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-in1.asia.apple.com (mail-out.asia.apple.com [17.82.254.63]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9C111E8167 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 22:10:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay1.asia.apple.com ( [17.82.200.18]) by mail-in1.asia.apple.com (Apple Singapore Mail Gateway) with SMTP id 81.3C.21841.3BE2B725; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:09:55 +0800 (MYT)
X-AuditID: 1152fe11-b7f256d000005551-e6-527b2eb36181
Received: from echium.asia.apple.com ( [17.82.200.52]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay1.asia.apple.com (Apple Singapore relay) with SMTP id D7.64.14371.3BE2B725; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:09:55 +0800 (MYT)
Received: from [17.83.34.149] (unknown [17.83.34.149]) by echium.asia.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0MVV00EQ1QGIVJ10@echium.asia.apple.com> for rtcweb@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:09:55 +0800 (SGT)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <CAPvvaaLpbWGZPBB1EMOPKQd_+t95bvG51NG4DnKhtEp1WSwRhg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 15:09:55 +0900
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <E32986AE-BE7F-4CEA-B387-1D03F05BD668@apple.com>
References: <CAOqqYVEER_HprgauRawO+_gGdLdMY1MUY8jrMhhi3yVDL31bFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaaLpbWGZPBB1EMOPKQd_+t95bvG51NG4DnKhtEp1WSwRhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiGHRCSHezXnWQwaU/MhZr/7WzOzB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoEr4/ysGewFa5krXs9dxtLAeIOpi5GTQ0LAROJ9zyooW0ziwr31 bF2MXBxCArsZJU7N2coKU7Rm1Q5WiEQPk8TMs7+hnKVMEkf3PmQHqWIW0JHo/f6NGcTmFdCT 2Ll3G1i3sEC0xK+dz8Bq2ARUJR7MOcYIYnMKBEu8n9vLBmKzAMUPTnjECjHHVuLDteMsELa2 xJN3F1ghZtpIXHu6GOq8mYwSmy/vAxskIiAv0d22COoHWYnT556zgBRJCHxklWjcN5NtAqPw LCQHzkJy4CwkSxYwMq9iFM9NzMzRzcwz1EsszkzUSywoyEnVS87P3cQIDut/gjsYpy40PMQo wMGoxMPrmVQcJMSaWFZcmXuIUYKDWUmE996zqiAh3pTEyqrUovz4otKc1OJDjNIcLErivL// lgcJCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbBZJk4OKUaGGdldh+24ziraHd7dzTX1/R5kiE5uld/G/5LvvosJs+f lYFHpTy57Ko3Y9KR0CbmQ076m1qXl5Qkbfm0pLhs+ju+zx2JVfZThVx+zLGf58a6Z8v1BOlt c+ZxHu0uebPqWkD5nvDaed6WuRnVrz95Wbm25PnwBruHHvvR0vn17MxU6762vkvblViKMxIN tZiLihMBuOqpgWcCAAA=
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrDLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiGHTCRHezXnWQwdKfUhZr/7WzOzB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoEr4/ysGewFa5krXs9dxtLAeIOpi5GTQ0LARGLNqh2sELaYxIV7 69m6GLk4hAR6mCRmnv3NCuEsZZI4uvchO0gVs4CORO/3b8wgNq+AnsTOvdvAuoUFoiV+7XwG VsMmoCrxYM4xRhCbUyBY4v3cXjYQmwUofnDCI1aIObYSH64dZ4GwtSWevLvACjHTRuLa08VQ V8xklNh8eR/YIBEBeYnutkVQZ8tKnD73nGUCo8AsJDfNQnLTLCRzFzAyr2IULUrNSaw01Ess zkzUSywoyEnVS87P3cQICUOhHYwf9xscYhTgYFTi4b3+oChIiDWxrLgy9xCjBAezkgjvvWdV QUK8KYmVValF+fFFpTmpxYcYpTlYlMR5Zf+VBwkJpCeWpGanphakFsFkmTg4pRoYg0wiLc47 +j7kUH+TvrT4lnX7nNdvV6WI3uM1iNp9fELNXnZZ/943MjejhPd9r0g+o6d8ViVCMllv+5WA M/uLOnVL+rS8c4QO6fo9nJy6zib6TfC+hXP0j9wsfKb/Z5FWV32ff3XD/E/v9/q1r1tfafEg +91KXa1LiuI11T02G8OfKws9nsmpxFKckWioxVxUnAgAJJXFZD8CAAA=
Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <hta@google.com>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 06:10:19 -0000

On Nov 2, 2013, at 19:34 , Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> wrote:

> Compared to VP8, H.264 baseline is only marginally better than H.263. This makes it hard to justify the inconvenience of post-installation additions.

Baseline is better than VP8, I think.  But I don't think this debate is about the codec quality, as previously noted (within reason).

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status