From nobody Mon Feb 1 10:34:28 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B017D3A1398 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:34:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -17.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63V_IrXeMVB4 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:34:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yb1-xb30.google.com (mail-yb1-xb30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8A973A13A1 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:34:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb30.google.com with SMTP id e67so17808992ybc.12 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:34:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lTw+yooMZlACqVYL4gcig9Rj5Sf/1F0cPLAtO7jA49E=; b=L+TFGX1ECG7qzTgfIE6ZxSGhTlVaZJy5t8D1OOd3hiJpUAEJY3H+q3s6F67DwMwboy tIxLZqbQeGuftChM5JsBlPSahwBxup6jn195E/cDD6DXbByYX35nnPHWjO32RfKh0Qtz S6DRsbiX3DwLE30HgNjRz4g3uYSSeGm5Vi+Ish15xyqWcpzxbGAgmiZikhAav7qI52tl efpdAm4rYz5Zt2HFCOZBnqcR/l9RdbiY+jvW4N9UIAtS99f1GDKFFY6LniEy/QwuavwO /S3d9xQs0+sqoA0URhb7HkOn3fUav2Evz2wkRv1MO3L5BlEBoBTeJE2BooVwJmiB+vIt fr+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lTw+yooMZlACqVYL4gcig9Rj5Sf/1F0cPLAtO7jA49E=; b=FGUDox5/FsZoMOkLUdO3kgpUjbCG2FcL/BTEYYZaoC1r5ufznYhqfopji1RLNzdLJG BEk6dZqfQRqum39fRadWm96EqnXi8YnAMCFez3nBtrtRsT4U4wEZYT1cP9AknSk3XsY4 dfGoJCqz+V0ckEXoV6p6JnbwIbyN/L13wBAouI+VcvVglvGSFhju0Q/6m2rxxXETd+8U axJr9iRQlWWq2bpuMgURKQgY3YrQdrK+KzzmRfYQihKuizqbCzyFelfvSOJCbYBv/fAE zyfJ/c8+/goLDEhZ5bUZedu5wEIMz+IymAboCWOpZTGdyUHUza3nLZX4qQvzP0W4SlEj IYoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531bkjANx2VRMZO5JDTztXr6JgTgyVM7xk+OfuZwnj6Cf3wQiJgX Ystt8cGrnbUpOGHSQAiV1T/h8fjsdJVbWibjSM4kFjRXWd2r/g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwbYbJCbXcdlhfpBkIUW0RXdjlDM5k28O/pAGHuK/apD7ADkBE+vl9Nzpo/3VbSb2ySEdKCcLVSCGK7FiXao50= X-Received: by 2002:a25:d186:: with SMTP id i128mr11005351ybg.46.1612204463554; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:34:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9331E58E-23EB-40B9-A70E-3586E0B4B467@sn3rd.com> In-Reply-To: From: Justin Uberti Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:34:11 -0800 Message-ID: To: Christer Holmberg Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" , Sean Turner , RTCWeb IETF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005b83cc05ba4a9a58" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB RFCs Published (aka draining cluster 238) X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 18:34:27 -0000 --0000000000005b83cc05ba4a9a58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Agreed. On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 9:13 AM Christer Holmberg wrote: > Hi, > > > > >It was pointed out to me that the examples document follows the BUNDLE > part of the conflict contained in C238. Is it possible that this needs > to be reconsidered, and this document possibly updated, as that conflict > gets resolved? > > > > I guess so. > > > > Regards, > > > > Christer > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:56 AM Sean Turner wrote: > > The SDP examples I-D document action popped out today! > > spt > > > On Jan 21, 2021, at 11:05, Bernard Aboba > wrote: > > > > Many thanks on the heroic efforts to unblock cluster 238. This will > also unblock publication of the WebRTC PeerConnection API as a W3C > Recommendation. > > > > Blocked Drain 238 - YouTube > > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:59 AM Sean Turner wrote: > > As you may have noticed over the last couple of days, all of RTCWEB=E2= =80=99s > I-D have now be published as RFCs. Congratulations to all those who > participated. > > > > The SDP examples draft, which was a WG draft but ended up being > AD-sponsored after the WG closed down, is still making its way through th= e > process. > > > > Cheers, > > spt > > _______________________________________________ > > rtcweb mailing list > > rtcweb@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > --0000000000005b83cc05ba4a9a58 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Agreed.

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 9:13 AM Christer Holmberg &l= t;christer.holmberg=3D40er= icsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

Hi,

=C2=A0

>It was pointed out to me th= at the examples document follows the BUNDLE part of the conflict contained = in C238.=C2=A0 Is it possible that this needs to be reconsidered, and this document= possibly updated, as that conflict gets resolved?

=C2=A0

I guess so.

=C2=A0

Regards,

=C2=A0

Christer

=C2=A0

=C2=A0

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:56 AM Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote= :

The SDP examples I-D document action popped out toda= y!

spt

> On Jan 21, 2021, at 11:05, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> wrote:<= br> >
> Many thanks on the heroic efforts to unblock cluster 238.=C2=A0 This w= ill also unblock publication of the WebRTC PeerConnection API as a W3C Reco= mmendation.
>
> Blocked Drain 238 - YouTube
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:59 AM Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> As you may have noticed over the last couple of days, all of RTCWEB=E2= =80=99s I-D have now be published as RFCs. Congratulations to all those who= participated.
>
> The SDP examples draft, which was a WG draft but ended up being AD-spo= nsored after the WG closed down, is still making its way through the proces= s.
>
> Cheers,
> spt
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org = https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
--0000000000005b83cc05ba4a9a58--