Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
Steve McFarlin <steve@tokbox.com> Mon, 16 December 2013 21:20 UTC
Return-Path: <steve@tokbox.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E03B1AD73E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:20:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id exTu5xf9NIEc for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:20:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com (mail-we0-f170.google.com [74.125.82.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727FB1AC3DD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:20:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w61so5259476wes.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:20:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=tqnMaNxfaroZNQBMgzqEfVrOjZi+WYg1hg1DCAZ+TEA=; b=SVPdmOjydN540xPMXBKRqkP3XdtnK6a/v+xHWJ9jnJhu2XKV4dcoMCWQD9JrkHgiJ9 7RSRZovWG7LWuaTKAjrfh64nqdhuus3XL7pi/bAdFZpZYksI5o4NAnun20MJ6zHk/EKJ vavF4bAFVycclEIUQ9nmXhBeBxneb/KAJirvfBs0z8g0J9zYy/OxsdgubKmpSt+wbPAW qq7tzYDouSzyIhQMrpVlLjGxJNWXS88pcHD0S9ZRj7Wv9N25xlUFeBkZKEMdn6g3Ec7n tb5QOWbnCjYo599bzpXpG3LA4mjpFQzkKLl7jCv0tTR8gkK2Kh9ILQnP4JGQwdLLTtTX gdIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlGiDASDCkl/y7yTvf+EDMnEUlNyioM5HMTNB0B/fl/r6DsPeakPUah3U9i3LK1MEoeL5zH
X-Received: by 10.180.77.49 with SMTP id p17mr36475wiw.30.1387228817149; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:20:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.10.207] (ginger.tokbox.com. [216.38.134.117]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xn17sm29461144wib.1.2013.12.16.13.20.14 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:20:16 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E6D14618-513D-4952-9943-CC18E1FE10D1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Steve McFarlin <steve@tokbox.com>
In-Reply-To: <52AF5FB3.2000205@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:20:12 -0800
Message-Id: <C1A6032A-86FF-4581-8208-4B784D44DEB6@tokbox.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com> <CC5B9561-27EE-4F80-ACC1-A4018638E524@tokbox.com> <52AF5FB3.2000205@bbs.darktech.org>
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:20:25 -0000
I am sorry. I was not sure if I should weight my Acceptable answers or not. Basically Yes = 1.0 and No = 0. Higher weight is 'better'. I should probably just have included my objections and not added any extra info as this seems to have added noise to the process. My apologies. Chairs please disregard my weights. steve On Dec 16, 2013, at 12:16 PM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote: > I know we're not supposed to reply directly to authors but I don't understand how to interpret Steve's answers... > > Steve, can you please clarify what "Acceptable (X)" means? What is the significance of X? Is the higher the number, the better? Does it imply that one Acceptable answer is more acceptable than another? > > Thanks, > Gili > > On 16/12/2013 3:10 PM, Steve McFarlin wrote: >> Weighted opinions are purely mine, and not that of my employer. I am not taking Cisco's gift into consideration. While it is generous and useful for some, the license 'hack' forces the installation of the library on the end user machine/device. This is not feasible on some platforms. >> >>> All entities MUST support H.264 >>> Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: >> >> No. >> >>> >>> Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them: >> >> Not all platforms expose access to a hardware or software encoder. If every feasible platform exposed H.264 API's then my reply would be "Acceptable 0.4". I also feel the IPR burden is too much on smaller players implementing MCU's. >> >>> All entities MUST support VP8 >>> Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: >> >> Yes. >> >>> >>> Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them: >> >> While I don't like putting my faith with other companies when it comes to IPR, I truly believe that Google will in good faith deal with any IPR issues that arise in the future. I think the gamble is an acceptable risk. >> >>> All entities MUST support both H.264 and VP8 >>> Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: >> >> Acceptable (0.3) >> >>> >>> Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them: >> >> While I still think the IPR on 264 is a burden, I think this is acceptable with respect to the browser space. My only concern is this option might just fragment/split the webrtc space with conforming and non conforming implementations. If selected I full expect FOSS implementations to be mostly VP8. With this said as long as the major players (browsers) implement both, then any custom non conforming RTC stack will still work in most cases. >> >> There is still 264 IPR issues on conforming MCU's that do any coding tasks with the 264 data. There are also IPR issues related to broadcasting and the sale of H.264 content, but those are obviously outside the scope of this discussion. >> >>> Browsers MUST support both H.264 and VP8, other entities MUST support at least one of H.264 and VP8 >>> Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: >> >> Acceptable (0.8) >> >>> >>> Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them: >> >> There is still 264 IPR issues on MCU's that do any coding tasks with the 264 data. There are also IPR issues related to broadcasting and the sale of H.264 content, but those are obviously outside the scope of this discussion. >> >>> All entities MUST support at least one of H.264 and VP8 >>> Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: >> >> No >> >>> >>> Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them: >> >> This only makes sense if we want to 'see who wins'. Given the division amongst many people I suspect we would see more 244 xor VP8 implementations then ones with both. >> >>> All entities MUST support H.261 >>> Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: >> >> No >> >>> >>> Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them: >> >> While the video is usable, it just can't compete in the modern video communications space. >> >>> There is no MTI video codec >>> Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: >> >> Acceptable (0.1) >> >>> >>> Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them: >> >> If no consensus is made on any other option then I see no other choice. This group needs to move forward at some point. >> >>> All entities MUST support H.261 and all entities MUST support at least one of H.264 and VP8 >>> Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: >> >> Acceptable (0.3) >> >>> >>> Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them: >> >> I really don't like the fallback to 261. It is just not a good codec. >> >>> All entities MUST support Theora >>> Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: >> >> Acceptable (0.2) >> >>> >>> Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them: >> >> While better than 261, I feel having at least one modern codec as a MUST is better than this. >> >>> All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, H.261} >>> Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: >> >> Acceptable (0.4) >> >>> >>> Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them: >> >> I really don't like 261. It is not a good codec for modern video communications. >> >>> All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, H.263} >>> Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: >> >> No. >> >>> >>> Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them: >> >> As far as I am aware 263 still has IPR issues. This just forces compliant stacks into a possible IPR violation issue. >> >>> All entities MUST support decoding using both H.264 and VP8, and MUST support encoding using at least one of H.264 or VP8 >>> Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: >> >> No. >> >>> >>> Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them: >> >> While I think the risk of an IPR suite for disturbing a H.264 decoder is small, I would not put it past some NPE popping up and forcing you to visit that lovely court in Texas. The visit alone would put any small player instantly out of business assuming they did not 'pay the fee'. This option in a IETF spec just makes it that much easier for a NPE or IPR holder to select targets. >> >>> All entities MUST support H.263 >>> Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: >> >> No >> >>> >>> Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them: >> >> Possible IPR issues. Not a modern codec. (I understand VP8 and 264 are not modern codecs per say, but at least they are 'more' modern than 263). >> >>> All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, Theora} >>> Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: >> >> Acceptable (0.6) >> >>> >>> Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them: >> >> Theora is a better quality codec than 261, and does not have any possible IPR issues that 263 has. I am not sure of the IPR status of Theora, and I don't ever recall seeing someone sued for it. Then again maybe there has never been a big enough target for anyone who thinks they have IPR on Theora from coming forward. I would personally be willing to take a risk on the much more than 263 or distributing a 264 decoder. >> >>> All entities MUST support decoding using Theora. >>> Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: >> >> No >> >>> >>> Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them: >> >> Maybe I have not had enough or had too much coffee today, but I don't see the logic in this option at the moment. >> >>> All entities MUST support Motion JPEG >>> Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: >> >> No No No. >> >>> >>> Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them: >> >> I understand the need to enumerate all options, but this just has so much FAIL attached to it. Do we really need interop with old Canon network cams (lol)? On the positive side I think Firefox still supports motion JEPG streaming as a relic from the Netscape implementation back in 96 (or earlier). Kidding aside, this will be way too bandwidth intensive to achieve good quality video. >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rtcweb mailing list >> rtcweb@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
- [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… David Singer
- [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives Ted Hardie
- [rtcweb] Clarification Requested: Straw Poll on V… John Leslie
- [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Video … Dave Crocker
- Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Vi… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Vi… John Leslie
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Adam Roach
- [rtcweb] Clarification - Re: Straw Poll on Video … Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Vi… Dave Crocker
- Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Vi… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Clarification Requested: Straw Poll … John Leslie
- Re: [rtcweb] Clarification Requested: Straw Poll … Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Vi… Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Vi… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Vi… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Brent Kelly
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Brent Kelly
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Martin Thomson
- [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll… Magnus Westerlund
- [rtcweb] Previous Process Proposal, was: Re: Stra… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Alexandre GOUAILLARD
- Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Vi… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Vi… Dave Crocker
- Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Vi… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Vi… Dave Crocker
- Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Vi… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Vi… Richard Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Vi… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Vi… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… bryandonnovan
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Engel Nyst
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … l.wood
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … l.wood
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … Chenxin (Xin)
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … Alexandre GOUAILLARD
- [rtcweb] Roman's Analysis of situation, was: Re: … Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Maik Merten
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … Erik Lagerway
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Engel Nyst
- [rtcweb] Why the Straw Poll Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Why the Straw Poll Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw … Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Why the Straw Poll DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Why the Straw Poll Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Why the Straw Poll Mary Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Gustavo Garcia
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Daniel Theophanes
- Re: [rtcweb] Why the Straw Poll Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Steve McFarlin
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Steve McFarlin
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Gustavo Garcia
- [rtcweb] Gustavo's straw poll (Was: Straw Poll on… cowwoc
- [rtcweb] Steve's choices (Re: Straw Poll on Video… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Mohammed Raad
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Mohammed Raad
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Nokia mincing Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Nokia mincing Mohammed Raad
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Nokia mincing Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Nokia mincing Mohammed Raad
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Nokia mincing Maik Merten
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Nokia mincing Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Nokia mincing cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- [rtcweb] Matthew's response to straw poll cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's response to straw poll Magnus Westerlund
- [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Nokia mi… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's response to straw poll Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Peter Dunkley
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's response to straw poll cb.list6
- [rtcweb] Peter Dunkley's response (was: Straw Pol… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Peter Dunkley's response (was: Straw… Peter Dunkley
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's response to straw poll cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Peter Dunkley's response cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's response to straw poll David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's response to straw poll SM
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's response to straw poll cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Tim Panton's choices Michael Procter
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's response to straw poll SM
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Mohammed Raad
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- [rtcweb] IETF requirements for mandatory technolo… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… SM
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Maik Merten
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Jack Moffitt
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Roni Even
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's response to straw poll DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Tim Panton's choices Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Dave Crocker
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Martin J. Dürst
- [rtcweb] IETF change control Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… Dave Crocker
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Alan Johnston
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Mishra, Sanjay
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Gunnar Hellstrom
- [rtcweb] Sanjay Mishra's choices (was: Re: Straw … Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rtcweb] Sanjay Mishra's choices (was: Re: St… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] Sanjay Mishra's choices cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Sanjay Mishra's choices Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Sanjay Mishra's choices cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Sanjay Mishra's choices (was: Re: St… Mishra, Sanjay
- Re: [rtcweb] Sanjay Mishra's choices cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Brent Kelly
- Re: [rtcweb] Sanjay Mishra's choices Mishra, Sanjay
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Silvia Pfeifer's choices Maik Merten
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Maik Merten
- Re: [rtcweb] Tim Panton's choices Maik Merten
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Maik Merten
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Gunnar Hellstrom
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Maik Merten
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Silvia Pfeifer's choices Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Ross Finlayson
- [rtcweb] H.261 performance (Re: Stephan Wenger's … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Tim Panton's choices Tim Panton
- [rtcweb] on Ross Finlayson's choices - was Re: St… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Feedback messages (and problem with … Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Tim Panton's choices Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Tim Panton's choices Maik Merten
- Re: [rtcweb] Tim Panton's choices Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Tim Panton's choices DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Stephan Wenger's choices Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Noki… David Singer
- [rtcweb] h.261 oddities David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Bogineni, Kalyani
- [rtcweb] Reminder that Straw Poll on Video Codec … Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Nico Pranke
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Adam Fineberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Paul Coverdale
- [rtcweb] Paul Coverdale's response to Straw Poll … cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… John Leslie
- [rtcweb] Adam Fineberg's choices was Re: Straw Po… Tim Panton
- [rtcweb] John Leslie's choices (Re: Straw Poll on… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Serge Lachapelle
- Re: [rtcweb] Adam Fineberg's choices was Re: Stra… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… stephane.proust
- Re: [rtcweb] Adam Fineberg's choices was Re: Stra… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Gaelle Martin-Cocher
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… cb.list6
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Hervé W.
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Andrew Allen
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Steve Donovan
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Xavier Marjou
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Markus.Isomaki
- [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives Miguel Casas-sanchez
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Gavin Llewellyn
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Erik Lagerway
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Benjamin Schwartz
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Robin Raymond
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Bossiel
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Suhas Nandakumar
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Espen Berger (espeberg)
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Pal Martinsen (palmarti)
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Arnaud Morin
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Martín Germán
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… stephane.cazeaux
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… அலெக்ஸாண்டர் - Alexander
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Göran Eriksson AP
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Adrian Grange
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Frode Kileng
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Michael Gorham
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Svein Yngvar Willassen
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- [rtcweb] on Svein Yngvar Willassen 's choices was… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Coban, Muhammed
- Re: [rtcweb] on Svein Yngvar Willassen 's choices… Svein Yngvar Willassen
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Mandyam, Giridhar
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Mike Linksvayer
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Bernhard.Feiten
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… HAYASHI, Tatsuya
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Karl Stahl
- [rtcweb] Transcoding objection/explaition/experie… Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Basil Mohamed Gohar
- [rtcweb] Martin J. Duerst's preferences (was: Re:… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Krasimir Kolarov
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Badri Rajasekar
- Re: [rtcweb] Transcoding objection/explaition/exp… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Stockhammer Thomas
- Re: [rtcweb] Martin J. Dürst's preferences Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rtcweb] Martin J. Dürst's preferences Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Martin J. Dürst's preferences Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Mark Harris
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Otto J Wittner
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Cavigioli, Chris
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… holger.debelts
- Re: [rtcweb] on Svein Yngvar Willassen 's choices… Tim Panton
- [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives matt frost
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… OSCAR DIVORRA ESCODA
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Badri Rajasekar
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Badri Rajasekar
- Re: [rtcweb] Feedback messages (and problem with … Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… OSCAR DIVORRA ESCODA
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Feedback messages (and problem with … Magnus Westerlund
- [rtcweb] Martin Duerst's responses (Re: Straw Pol… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Martin Duerst's responses (Re: Straw… Martin J. Dürst
- [rtcweb] Giri's choices - interoperability (Re: S… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Giri's choices - interoperability (R… Mandyam, Giridhar
- Re: [rtcweb] Feedback messages (and problem with … Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Feedback messages (and problem with … Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Feedback messages (and problem with … Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternativ… Bjoern Hoehrmann