Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 11 July 2013 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF7B11E8112 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.492
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.108, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ziZy9Di5QBzW for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6D811E8114 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ey16so7971567wid.16 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=epZCuvn3gKKee6/YemIR37zJcbCZqzK0Tyt2458Hkgw=; b=jEVRzDjpuyHlmavhfmNs+v6llNVZUvndmWGhQAiIGeR973dSn5FB/RMITHSZBf4bVK CytaBpgGrgdYnOZHvS4+y9mVRmbVP0HA5Qby2AW41jR0+8a+rVA9ZwqvG3akJQ187DoP NUm2/xZIre9vlghUWtwGslEZV7orF3HK0/i0FG23XG929PjBvDeewyMCfCqV30oRh5N+ mwYXSjEAAGkS928PVywIVfek9ennEqE2soraekKkEXD6ZE5t/URToK93ksp6JWLEWqHq CNDzn0m0UsWGSZ1p/HzyQy6h/k17lm2Qct3byw1S+XHH+ypyBeiffJWIF8UObhsLj9ti 0jPg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.181.12.10 with SMTP id em10mr20921598wid.14.1373571469247; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.46 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1135D31FD@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBuCTdFsUMtmuBz6BnrSJMpHywEZU+x+m8ARnGprvzDzA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaa+dyYmvsareEy1a9+7ketEFjNarsnRLXkpT_YHPTYni2w@mail.gmail.com> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1135D31FD@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU9r9OT+XW=Ewf=25yBJGCEZxCVnu_r1D=Eu=f9wrV4Kg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:37:53 -0000

On 11 July 2013 12:04, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
>> In you last mail on the subject you mentioned that we will be discussing No Plan in Berlin together with plans A and B. Could we please add this to the agenda?
>
> No. We believe that conversation needs to happen in the W3C WebRTC WG. I expect to see a message from W3C chairs on this at some point.

I'm a little nervous about this.  Where does the decision on the
separation of responsibilities (API vs. SDP) get made?