Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Plan for Usage of SDP and RTP - Lower level API minus SDP

Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Thu, 07 March 2013 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C7621F8AAC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:27:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.802
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.125, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ULYw-YgMcaG for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:27:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-f170.google.com (mail-vc0-f170.google.com [209.85.220.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF47821F897F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:27:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id p16so547446vcq.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 13:27:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vf61ojDVzhCxvoqwoRucZ7E8oL8Dl+IV+/xyVAGCgPQ=; b=cUvppsUCw9xL6Yp8kkJkd5ghOVT/p1P9wqoOMalkSmLA8szgqPSrG7OmqWx7PgE4yQ x7XhzxDjMfrWuFLpBRBGxuTE1qHtd2t/l7hFxa1QE5RnXGsNK0a8cUu6DHtS5ox0NOl9 Jvy20clWST4wvAKeqyHOaVwEO5dRqB0QmYAlI2PL7pzTIo4iHPSMJylFsnsd/SxNZ/PM JHaVuGPMmy4ucKXhhp4R1aM0/oxftXHzwGN93YAwRABiK9kgBQ+62hYloz1kQWKVOjCh VbC4Nv7HusKzUgP1KgMxzsO7EMNTocomlYjkwrd5W2rkftuvySOdy5MRhpquQ45CF4Ve IIuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=vf61ojDVzhCxvoqwoRucZ7E8oL8Dl+IV+/xyVAGCgPQ=; b=Z+rmoWa/W6NE9yRx6g0ZDlZMwDc56u9dhlkTWGj60TTv90sAfIFVAEqW6MhboWBa1W Mav/FkPNmVKSG3nlPvErnLAlfaHC42QoLD71BlM95gjr8snrTnIs9ap4YBdYuGohay54 Sh0c86FH37S1QNnAJ35+VBhUX5awv7oxcOk/x3HlamAdn8QqJhH+/J5qjLmkA+9l6H4k jv6AMa29CNBEolEjkcDoY1fJD+6/QBftc3J+9QRyRHVMhLFPImTRPWftSrm2cD3NaHd1 q4Yu3yBEigF/Cl02OjRbN2Qg3xhiwddm0E9vu2pn2uvrChhApxswAoqajNcC6BcIH152 wZPA==
X-Received: by 10.52.17.104 with SMTP id n8mr1637535vdd.12.1362691633177; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 13:27:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.49.102 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:26:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfnZKVOgmh_5Qb2HeXuAL1BdxDc=U-=t1NfEEMC4DHMUew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CD5D3F35.B22B%robin@hookflash.com> <B9549E2E-6E68-4F34-A9C0-1F050285A70A@acmepacket.com> <CAJrXDUGSMfQ=SNrSxKVvay=4JUXHULy0cO2pRN9+iFJ23doWZQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUHvcsuN6vXs8wku_aUrs-siHdn2wBDOJBgpgDPJySgdSg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMt7vaMnhcDD0-U7n6Hn-T=sHcGUGEV4=vAs8DVcoi-CQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUGqxDxS5=_YnLOWVT6xOgXYuspGS5U2gXevc+PP2vLdHw@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfnZKVOgmh_5Qb2HeXuAL1BdxDc=U-=t1NfEEMC4DHMUew@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:26:33 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUEK9DCMfxOoq-8HPQwjTZrVvW-CEZJzte_gzyUs16hJuw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl9/4VatOex3NCW1zuE3yz5EDCouGJYmnGTsP2sSw6yqmiobVILy8yscQkL0peTKEwcAJl/3YFLoNJFQomNT0a8aJ39i63gdAeuU+/9SuasEYZXZ0jf2mhYVp1lm7w1V7PA1sRMBKMw9Xea1xqgp4k/w9Be7mbw6nVPOiu5un3BDmhV0+QmOtI2mtZ/99Ow7q3cqsJy
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Plan for Usage of SDP and RTP - Lower level API minus SDP
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 21:27:14 -0000

So, would you like a SessionDescription to send to the other side that
is flexible and manageable, such as a JSON object?

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:
> 2013/3/7 Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>:
>> Anti-SDP camp: methods=low-level methods   and   format=none
>
> What does "format=none" mean? There should be some kind of "format" to
> tell the remote peer our video codec preferences, ICE candidates and
> so, am I right? This is not about passing a URL to the remote.
>
> That's exactly what SDP attempts to achieve but SDP is too flexible
> and unmanageable.
>
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>