IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Fri, 11 July 2014 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734F81B2BB9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ccY0Y65JsYR for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com (mail-qc0-f171.google.com [209.85.216.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 937571B2BB8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id w7so1180534qcr.2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wIRItnzqpyDwBm3bs1EKQuQxuRCEzwyRTJjO8Q4s650=; b=gUPW/rnIK5ZRszQ/f57f4FBJpfJTLd+Z2S9U8P1IdCWVWOHR0YfPiTIuhUTyQFcUSE xKUxcbzGsAaTtH2RtBd/J2hA/M56HxcHUASJ5y+bdwANUFBDCPEFpOnj+lt/IWg2D4d0 zUJpJLQCxXhTzD27XgihezQS9e6HiDewEH4lKq/7KMjXuK3u5ptMIxFRbRq0iMMo451+ yO5dJlGqps07t2ipo7PHzMTzidmFqI1avOxWM55QkXCU/ZWFVjMQ9dXzc469oqbZgK9X gjSJ1lJrZDyOU++6kb+2fY27Mt+6zIPI12gtVt4dJHdRl45UY8b2JWVWGAyMfbZimBSL qeFw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn5fSNwDkj5ua0y54kTkNOyITaCGFjR7pNBe1GTQQ1+LDA6/+tDxPe+UtNJGZwczbxbHVlp
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.129.68 with SMTP id n4mr94032840qas.66.1405095426773; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.234.161 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.234.161 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-3fWP0q2O58FirSYcV3Ldai4TcRoBQg7nDx4OTPc_evrA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegf=kLtiUKoue=ahXP4fUhLJNNd8vCaQTECQxjK5R7cjLTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxv8s5-FNR-kq0C01H_Ev39cyBs5P__Pd-0cmCXDFYy-YQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPV_iVcSmi+ndDaYY6zX=F7TRoSDFqe5hzJP3-NjZ7Y1w@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=CMAOwVF3=gNY9qrsTfsEwuiwvGZ_1SaS0waOUE83-Ug@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMPyT4y1v12O5pb7Khs2ge0pgjUugrBS0NoK8=SLOScxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3fWP0q2O58FirSYcV3Ldai4TcRoBQg7nDx4OTPc_evrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:17:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfke27BGRQc-HhZnQRHZWJfPzYjGf+spSdn_yh-Wb87NjA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2bac4c9e7e004fded4598"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/KiLBs9tUFni7NnIOrglk-6ftEeo
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 16:17:09 -0000

On Jul 11, 2014 6:13 PM, "Justin Uberti" <juberti@google.com> wrote:
>
>

> Chrome supports ICE lite, with regular nomination. There were a lot of
requests for it.

That is great. BTW does Chrome use aggressive nomination when the peer is
full ICE? I did not check that.

Thanks.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email