IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Nokia mincing)

Jack Moffitt <jack@metajack.im> Sat, 21 December 2013 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <metajack@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15AF71ADF68 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 07:41:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BREZxi_gN6ov for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 07:41:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22d.google.com (mail-ob0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A431ADF66 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 07:41:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id gq1so3974738obb.32 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 07:41:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LShnFAvPinJNEA8PCdIv2x/kRNO29n6xry4iqk5rhZM=; b=uW7X7bpYL0enaKJ2LucHzv9IxDTDQu0vfrbN4+EL5m12DhCThYZcPZMMwgzDOP4K0g 7N+Y1QblYTbTQi5M9m9Btz8U+1g7lWFbBPQV8N7OncRxEWgry1gW5UiHQoHcEbpLy+xl 3D+JwfyoLf9sZB9TG4xuDKvYK3eCpKmnm1WPuOV5ZWGeKKs6Jp0/yHvwkVOh5Bdt9eNI I2BCmbZ61R8l9R7+vRf1LpTIqpWqXSoL49JZLOHmnhHOk6OgWKws1FnlzMNoGDt95dZl xeiPJmZRau4lwe5FmT45+zsM+Z2jWctvQAutOydVecjW4t9UvvQY8n+T8eF+UuMxRPCi /7Pg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.60.71 with SMTP id f7mr242103oer.82.1387640498229; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 07:41:38 -0800 (PST)
Sender: metajack@gmail.com
Received: by 10.60.17.70 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 07:41:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52B5A7D5.6060102@googlemail.com>
References: <CA+E6M0m5O1OqjBm13qNoRAtYZKwOs+4fs3evyO2VuuO1uqQ5eA@mail.gmail.com> <CED773F0.2D6AA%stewe@stewe.org> <20131219033000.GK3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <CA+E6M0n9frSRbbrXh=jczQETX13HX6LDGUCq2P4=6voXx93ZVA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHp8n2m5XNC8UfDswGfD=0qCPaddcsrg08FJKXnDsz-A+tWqzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+E6M0mwWVEAv6zeET1fwdL6oDB-Cxag64XNV1EJhk-oP3241g@mail.gmail.com> <52B38E3E.1040801@bbs.darktech.org> <52B40035.2010308@alvestrand.no> <0D649E40-454C-4945-B148-FD8AC6D49349@apple.com> <52B5A7D5.6060102@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 08:41:38 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: hc2ZNTD26sQhDrCJ3UklNsWr4TE
Message-ID: <CAP7VpsVy0sfZpGQ2Vj=NGnvNpSjRhFc+bSaDyCaLbTLkGUjRVA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jack Moffitt <jack@metajack.im>
To: Maik Merten <maikmerten@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Nokia mincing)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 15:41:42 -0000

> This sounds like a dangerous loophole to let any party block basically
> anything and I hope there are provisions in place to mitigate such
> scenarios.

Opus had several of these. It is still MTI for WebRTC because the
group was convinced the claims are spurious. As far as I know there is
no formal way to respond to such claims or get them removed. Each
member must decide for themselves whether the claim is valid or not.

jack.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email