Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

[Peter Thatcher <[e-mail]>]

Correct my if I'm wrong, but the API already leaves what goes over the wire
completely up to the JS app.  So we couldn't re-open a debate of "SDP or
not SDP" for the wire format, because there's nothing to debate.  We
already decided it would be left to the JS to decide.  The only thing left
to debate is the API.

Or am I wrong?



On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Christer Holmberg <
[e-mail]> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
> We need to be very clear what we talk about, or some people are always
> going to be confused :)
>
> So, AFAIK, the discussion is about SDP O/A usage in the API, only in the
> API, and nowhere but the API.
>
> Whatever people us on the wire is outside the scope.
>
> Right?
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
>
> Sent from *Windows* using *TouchDown* (www.nitrodesk.com)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Peter Thatcher [[e-mail]]
> *To:* Martin Thomson [[e-mail]]
> *CC:* [e-mail] [[e-mail]]
> *Subject:* Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
> Martin, you're right; that was overly harsh of me.  Adam, I apologize.
>  I'll be civil in the future.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Martin Thomson <[e-mail]>wrote:
>
>> I agree with Peter, except for this bit:
>>
>> On 18 June 2013 15:16, Peter Thatcher <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> > Adam, I think you're confused.
>>
>>  Adam is much harder to confuse than you think, or than he professes.
>>
>> Speaking of burning it all down and starting over.  If you want a
>> house-related analogy, that's not quite correct.  It's refusing to
>> build an extension because the old house, while legally fit for
>> habitation, is falling down around your ears.  Since you only need
>> foundations, it's not that big a job (though I'll grant you that it's
>> bigger than many people realize, even with that smaller scope).
>>
>
>