Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees

Ron <ron@debian.org> Thu, 12 December 2013 21:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ron@debian.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DB11AE4EB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:43:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O02M9BlqlCes for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:43:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111441AE42C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:43:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppp14-2-56-86.lns21.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO audi.shelbyville.oz) ([14.2.56.86]) by ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 13 Dec 2013 08:13:12 +1030
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by audi.shelbyville.oz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62724F8F3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 08:13:11 +1030 (CST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at audi.shelbyville.oz
Received: from audi.shelbyville.oz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (audi.shelbyville.oz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id elUeFlIWbuV2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 08:13:10 +1030 (CST)
Received: by audi.shelbyville.oz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C81794F902; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 08:13:10 +1030 (CST)
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 08:13:10 +1030
From: Ron <ron@debian.org>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20131212214310.GR3245@audi.shelbyville.oz>
References: <186CE8D65BA3A741A81A543F936DD0D10A5803D8@xmb-rcd-x07.cisco.com> <A672E2AB-827D-46E8-9EB1-D7ED82B10B94@cisco.com> <20131211193239.GK3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <558F8D49-4024-4DF1-9A9E-AF422F1292C2@iii.ca> <20131212011550.GM3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <E8882BCE-4795-4CF5-B785-18C2141A5DE2@iii.ca> <CAD5OKxvy8xGuiR7oUbJJwTaxGfPJ=MHpd8Hp5MfpPLy8LmNaQg@mail.gmail.com> <D5A2C5EC-C65F-4E39-9A56-315B94C5FB1D@iii.ca> <CAD5OKxs-OoqwbQgBy7K4wQRffCk0=8Qmo_xJQdSwhBL2F85v1g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxs-OoqwbQgBy7K4wQRffCk0=8Qmo_xJQdSwhBL2F85v1g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:43:21 -0000

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 03:04:31PM -0500, Roman Shpount wrote:
> I think it would be beneficial to have a place on openh264 site where the
> site owners (Cisco) would specifically ask any third party to disclose
> their IPR claims against this implementation.

We so far can't even get the organisations who have active contributors
in this WG and which hold H.264 patents to comply with their obligations
for disclosure under the IETF requirements.[1]

Why would you expect a note on a Cisco website to work any better?

  Ron


[1] - Which would unless I'm mistaken, include ...   Cisco?