Re: [rtcweb] Locus of API discussion

[Ted Hardie <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) <
[e-mail]> wrote:

>
> I am frankly quite concerned given earlier comments that yes, the W3C had
> given responsibility for "JSEP" and the resulting SDP work to IETF, and so
> now we have the IETF WG making decisions but the discussion happening on
> the W3C list -- which means there's no "paper trail" prior to the IETF
> meeting on an IETF list about how the participants have weighed in -- and
> then conversely when the W3C spec gets to last call there will be no "paper
> trail" at the W3C showing how decisions had been reached about the SDP
> "API", as that happened over in the MMUSIC WG, which list was not even
> copied on this message.
>
>
All three lists you cited have public archives, so it is clearly not the
case that there is no "paper trail".   But it does occasionally get
confusing, and the chairs made the "locus of API discussions" point in
order to take a particular set of discussions proposing a significant
change to the API and reduce the number of places someone who have to
follow to contribute to that discussion.

I grieve that this has disappointed you,

Ted