IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] A problem with both A and B

Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> Mon, 20 May 2013 09:34 UTC

Return-Path: <emil@sip-communicator.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEC221F92B2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:34:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.374
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.374 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.225, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FJ8sgdUGcXkk for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-x22d.google.com (mail-bk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6AA21F9239 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id je2so156123bkc.18 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=CUvDirgaHsY0HSgE/sxGbnbV6869WZiRsHakf5ULnYY=; b=lNhLM+a75b5Lytutz8hdGjhCqj3OP9Gvbwvq4HJCOzxtAgcWDfzPR/rf5cOAOj0Nb8 HoCOfnVXLORkG1jFtaSH+pqApNfy21cEyW5467xLrlI75xJ9sROC+/VDD2G3VCbaiXCt Rmm76w3eXQbNqTXHc2meWXZep/02TgoIVvbJ7Ef0FLOnlU8EbXlLdUBt6F2H2J02KBbA C5LjkYqzpvxG3JZmq1FySb4SVgNJNofCYmu037V0idBP66bbMB+Mz50iOyfdrkSpmuRn 9UQXtxs3wQrTwXvIS69leBZZUzsbjEeslta8G0eoBdftvmqqYCK41AZa6j9REoza80nq 9Osg==
X-Received: by 10.205.9.193 with SMTP id ox1mr8803231bkb.35.1369042447249; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from camionet.local (77-85-165-231.btc-net.bg. [77.85.165.231]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fz10sm5522660bkc.9.2013.05.20.02.34.05 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 20 May 2013 02:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5199EE06.30705@jitsi.org>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 12:33:58 +0300
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Organization: Jitsi
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kevin Dempsey <kevindempsey70@gmail.com>
References: <51965506.7050008@jitsi.org> <CAMvTgccSpdAa2F26eeRg61mLQg+ThWfHNU5xXHwz0Ap7bePxBQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMvTgccSpdAa2F26eeRg61mLQg+ThWfHNU5xXHwz0Ap7bePxBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmsg/ElPllAGikaFe4K1/z3QQ60owZupx7LnoIUTNYpZZzzHe+SZNvZ+4Y1c4z8+/3MG/Cq
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] A problem with both A and B
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 09:34:24 -0000

On 20.05.13, 11:53, Kevin Dempsey wrote:
> Relying on SSRC signalling would mean that RTP sent before the SSRC
> identity arrives would not be handled consistently with RTP arriving
> after the SSRC identity.

If the application is doing the SSRC signalling and if the WebRTC API
provides a way of retrieving it, an app would be able to signal an SSRC
before, together with, or after the SDP from O/A. It will all be up to
exactly what the app needs.

Emil

-- 
https://jitsi.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email