IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rtcweb] Unified Plan: 'bundle-only' documentation

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Fri, 27 September 2013 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA5E11E814F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.874
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.874 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.276, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tGPMOKfFBf5H for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg20.ericsson.net (sesbmg20.ericsson.net [193.180.251.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C32321F9CA1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb38-b7fcf8e0000062b8-d4-52458f312f91
Received: from ESESSHC012.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sesbmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 16.83.25272.13F85425; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:59:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.146]) by ESESSHC012.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.54]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:59:13 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Unified Plan: 'bundle-only' documentation
Thread-Index: Ac67icB0IqAhwR+TTWqeeD7ies23YA==
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:59:12 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4ADF2D@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.18]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4ADF2DESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvra5hv2uQwdwOeYu1/9rZHRg9liz5 yRTAGMVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CVMffPJ6aCNSIVqzbOZWlgfCfQxcjJISFgInF8z15mCFtM4sK9 9WwgtpDAUUaJo//Kuxi5gOwljBLvLy5m6mLk4GATsJDo/qcNUiMioC5x+eEFdhBbWMBIYtrW LawQcXOJhtdrWCBsPYld3yeA1TALaEnsmLCPEcRmEVCVWL92DxOIzSvgK/H98wqwOCPQDd9P rWGCqBeXuPVkPhPEbQISS/ach7pTVOLl43+sELaixMdXEDOZBfIlFm2ZygIxU1Di5MwnLBMY hWchWT0LydhZSFpmIWmBiOtJ3Jg6hQ3C1pZYtvA1M4StKzHj3yGoGmuJ32+PMSKrWcDIuYqR ozi1OCk33chgEyMwfg5u+W2xg/HyX5tDjNIcLErivB/fOgcJCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbFF5XmpBYf YmTi4JRqYBTh6Tpd+4TjnM8M/Y+znJf92fh7jYFRfDfbsq6XTRrHcq+c/aXrsKvsuluE87el 9z4/6t0X+WeeRbcur3RR5D3Fu/7y/3kMbUt/fwkyOs/zVffGhs/8++Xv6e7PTPslGBU35/Wn 6Z3283Y9nGFR/Xj+U5WjTZw8r/k3qNsmigS2aDhNVmhf916JpTgj0VCLuag4EQBY+ScObQIA AA==
Subject: [rtcweb] Unified Plan: 'bundle-only' documentation
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:59:23 -0000

Hi,



On the MMUSIC list I have suggested updated SDP Offer/Answer text for BUNDLE.



Part of that text is the definition, and usage, of the SDP 'bundle-only' attribute.



However, eventhough I personally think it fits well there (and I believe Adam had the same opinion, when I talked with him off-line in Berlin), afaik there has never been any formal WG agreement that the 'bundle-only' attribute will be defined in the BUNDLE draft.



So, without going into the details (there are some issues, and if you are interested there are mail threads on the MMUSIC list dealing with those) do people have any issues with defining the SDP 'bundle-only' attribute, and the usage of it, in BUNDLE?



If not, can we make a WG decision on the matter?



Regards,



Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email