From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Unified Plan: 'bundle-only' documentation
Thread-Index: Ac67icB0IqAhwR+TTWqeeD7ies23YA==
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:59:12 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4ADF2D@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4ADF2DESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [rtcweb] Unified Plan: 'bundle-only' documentation
Precedence: list

--_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4ADF2DESESSMB209erics_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,



On the MMUSIC list I have suggested updated SDP Offer/Answer text for BUNDL=
E.



Part of that text is the definition, and usage, of the SDP 'bundle-only' at=
tribute.



However, eventhough I personally think it fits well there (and I believe Ad=
am had the same opinion, when I talked with him off-line in Berlin), afaik =
there has never been any formal WG agreement that the 'bundle-only' attribu=
te will be defined in the BUNDLE draft.



So, without going into the details (there are some issues, and if you are i=
nterested there are mail threads on the MMUSIC list dealing with those) do =
people have any issues with defining the SDP 'bundle-only' attribute, and t=
he usage of it, in BUNDLE?



If not, can we make a WG decision on the matter?



Regards,



Christer

--_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4ADF2DESESSMB209erics_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <5B36C4DDF38F0247BA3DDAA9B219DECA@ericsson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html dir=3D"ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-=
1">
<style id=3D"owaParaStyle">P {=0A=
	MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN-TOP: 0px=0A=
}=0A=
</style>
</head>
<body ocsi=3D"0" fpstyle=3D"1">
<div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 10pt; di=
rection: ltr;">
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>On the MMUSIC list I have suggested updated SDP Offer/Answer text for BU=
NDLE.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Part of that text is the definition, and usage, of the SDP 'bundle-only'=
 attribute.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>However, eventhough I personally think it fits well there (and I believe=
 Adam had the same opinion, when I talked with him off-line in Berlin), afa=
ik there has never been any formal WG agreement that the 'bundle-only' attr=
ibute will be defined in the BUNDLE
 draft.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>So, without going into the details (there are some&nbsp;issues, and&nbsp=
;if you are interested there are mail threads on the MMUSIC list dealing wi=
th those)&nbsp;do people have any issues with defining the SDP 'bundle-only=
' attribute, and the usage of it, in BUNDLE?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If not, can we make a WG decision on the matter?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Christer</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>

--_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4ADF2DESESSMB209erics_--