IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives

Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com> Wed, 11 December 2013 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <agouaillard@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292C81ADF54 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:34:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lEl3iNZ6_Twn for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:34:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22e.google.com (mail-ob0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651501ADF50 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:34:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id wn1so6970949obc.19 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:34:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=PaI2DMJzgXaJ4d0//nJUaEnLkbb7yX6k4j90qn2/uzc=; b=h1UB44npYi9cviFR8fPvCFJEsupM0h0nYXJwn8Hukq/Oa0xMjNGRVUnIL2DLTk5IOs 1Dn+yEOWLOHJJp72fuCu2PqXX/NlEP+/RI4fD8Ce9UuS/px/kFjjlla7QNvPHeO0jlHT hW4ecYyNgn/mRTABVgylgmAtLNGPCNVMLEa9/J3W5Dmf928Ifu4K6BukG5BLajnPzxki JaXqK6FyIsboEuXZ2Lum7oeg/PtI6usZFhruHY4HxHgMmMBLWcOmcIXHKYExCHYir7sm Gn8D16DAe00hKT63Wo4WNXtN7dGF34MsSeK06QyJdjGOLkQaK/dU4qbwLXHYXExiNCoI KjNw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.99.71 with SMTP id eo7mr1243579oeb.61.1386772490646; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:34:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.183.6.227 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:34:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20131211122518.69a97d04@lminiero>
References: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A48441927F3A@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <52A6D092.3090701@ericsson.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484419289C7@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A48441928A32@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <52A79BCF.2090404@bbs.darktech.org> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A48441928E45@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <9E34D50A21D1D1489134B4D770CE0397680A3871@SZXEMA504-MBX.china.huawei.com> <20131211122518.69a97d04@lminiero>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 22:34:50 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHgZEq6VPcLmpk8fY3nd3sEpOTDVQLkLYia0YrLw1dR-kyn3Ag@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b33d414b07bbd04ed432158"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:34:58 -0000

+1 on a separate mailing list for the video Codec.


On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com>wrote:

> Il giorno Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:06:51 +0000
> "Chenxin (Xin)" <hangzhou.chenxin@huawei.com> ha scritto:
>
> <snip>
>
> >
> > Second, At least, we could move the codec discussion to a separate
> > mailing list like PNTAW. I need say sorry to Harald about it. I
> > objected his same suggestion before because I believe we could get a
> > result in plan. But now I find he was so wise.
>
> +1, that's what I was going to propose too. It is probably the only way
> to be able to work on the other important RTCWEB stuff in here, while
> keeping the video discussion going on.
>
> Lorenzo
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email