Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot

["Wang, Ye-Kui" <[e-mail]>]

Sure - but that is clearly not the context here.

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 13, 2013, at 17:24, "Gerard Fernando" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

Hello YK,

The disclosure process in MPEG is not based on who you are, or on your Business model.

Kind regards

Gerard


________________________________
From: "Wang, Ye-Kui" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
To: Stockhammer Thomas <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; Bo Burman <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: "[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Sent: Wednesday, 13 March 2013, 10:40
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot

> >  How many others who did not respond to MPEG LA's call but have IPR
> > are
> there?
>
> [TS]  Just one more hypothesis: If I would have, what would be my
> obligation/motivation to do so now?

Speaking of the motivation part; that would depend on who YOU are and what kind of business model or plan YOU have in mind.

BR, YK

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> [mailto:[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>] On Behalf
> Of Stockhammer Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 7:53 AM
> To: Bo Burman
> Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot
>
>
> >  How many others who did not respond to MPEG LA's call but have IPR are
> there?
>
> [TS]  Just one more hypothesis: If I would have, what would be my
> obligation/motivation to do so now?
>
> >>>
> >>> We appreciate the need to have time to evaluate the specific words
> >>> of the license statements that are forthcoming, and the need for the
> >>> people who haven't made their IPR declarations over the last couple
> >>> of years of discussion to do so within the next couple of weeks -
> >>> but we do think that it is important to use the face to face time
> >>> that we have here in Orlando to lay to rest any *other* issues than
> >>> the licensing terms and other issues derived from Google's
> announcement.
> >>
> >> I am not sure we can have a reasoned consideration of 'other issues
> derived'
> >> at such short notice.
> >>
> >> Look, I'd like our discussions and decisions to be informed and
> >> considered, and there simply isn't time for either.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Harald
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> rtcweb mailing list
> >>> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> >>
> >> David Singer
> >> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rtcweb mailing list
> >> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> >
>
> ---
> Dr. Thomas Stockhammer (CEO) || [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> || phone +49
> 89 978980 02 || cell [phone] || http://www.nomor-research.com<http://www.nomor-research.com/>
> Nomor Research GmbH  -  Sitz der Gesellschaft: München - Registergericht:
> München, HRB 165856 - Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE238047637 - Geschäftsführer:
> Dr. Thomas Stockhammer, Dr. Ingo Viering.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb


_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb