Re: [rtcweb] cisco binary on ec2

Matt Fredrickson <creslin@digium.com> Thu, 21 November 2013 22:47 UTC

Return-Path: <creslin@digium.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88181AE3C5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:47:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lDFu6hz0tYNf for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:47:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com (mail-ee0-f41.google.com [74.125.83.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E391AE3C4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:47:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id t10so176191eei.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:47:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Hn1ur/h7fRXtzaqILPAmXjD3omwN3EbsKSScJC0JMSQ=; b=BhV2nLLVcyjO+BAbsRcxeIYEVdnlUQYZAEaHZwSOQ72T2zHZyuUQpdgxLKzeNLa6eu EwqT6sdF0hr6qeIE6M3SrrSKtP5lGoZ/tSDaDpu5RzG/ri1ZuuNdQP4m21fOUyWI2Ys+ 5zGntXzDbXM2+MO+ahJlwAC5Scz8YIHr21m7eYbl+5i9OR/EJffpQ2kCpbJ4SyzVRTnK pdyBsRXHEoZ7EEp3TUhsBukNBwpLN/kOySHYpmMqu5IfjaWK0e4S53k42YdjjKJb7DbK 9JPg8t3GJFOMNVNdcLyrnOpiLi90o+SkBulkPVFdzzq2w84JZZ09CdHNXIOyIQdToakt lFpw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnhbJBinVd8d7lwYBG58A+WZ2Ll0eDvNxScphagDOeDOm91ZjMfaUmeEaoD/Spfobg3SotP
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.101.4 with SMTP id a4mr11863784eeg.28.1385074023816; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:47:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.220.7 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:47:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CBD53918-3F7C-43BB-8F57-202495797672@iii.ca>
References: <D9C9C6C10CA24644B3A854DB0C12E7D5014C12B5F1@gbplmail03.genband.com> <52891EDB.2050607@googlemail.com> <D0698C9F-967F-4797-A9F3-E461B9DAE8EB@apple.com> <528B2ABE.4040701@googlemail.com> <BLU169-W24713EECAF0BE76A85E94B93E60@phx.gbl> <528C79AD.10608@googlemail.com> <BLU169-W19675CF49C4FAF3F889E4793E60@phx.gbl> <528D0355.3090603@googlemail.com> <55E140BF-D025-4556-A4F2-2441EE766F6B@apple.com> <528E4139.3050808@googlemail.com> <2B458AB3-A219-4F3C-B393-8F0969C2CC08@apple.com> <D4CA7C71-1CBF-4090-AB26-48E0B9215590@iii.ca> <CABcZeBNcoRWNsaTsjOEF03jNwAunGNOtozv0E4p5utVjVjLWUQ@mail.gmail.com> <A5B5C80F-AEA0-4E28-8B3C-73654E2BE76B@stevek.com> <CABcZeBO+AZqvG4Div7CgBkizyYck6oy4_ZeVtkP8jfHoK1Dp6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHZ_z=ww_mdfo31wVBiB6HySfmbtQxCzKLuWsV4wERWxAt+72Q@mail.gmail.com> <CBD53918-3F7C-43BB-8F57-202495797672@iii.ca>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:47:03 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHZ_z=ymZ7PXpHV2=9rLyCvZwKY6x__ycbV6fcxWfr1p8DU4Vg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matt Fredrickson <creslin@digium.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] cisco binary on ec2
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:47:15 -0000

Sorry, my facetiousness didn't get through in my email.  Clearly we
need to be discussing enhancements to emoticons for email instead of
this silly MTI debate.

I concur, and I don't know of any insurmountable problems with using
the Cisco H.264 plugin on EC2 cloud instances.

Matthew Fredrickson

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>; wrote:
>
> On Nov 21, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Matt Fredrickson <creslin@digium.com>; wrote:
>
>>  I cannot use that on my dynamically
>> deployed EC2 instances due to licensing restrictions. :-)
>
>
> My understanding of the legal situation is that you can use the cisco binary on your EC2 instance and have Cisco pay the MPEG-LA fees.