Re: [rtcweb] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-13

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Tue, 13 May 2014 22:06 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677EA1A01E2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 May 2014 15:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fe9OZ9w1hCks for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 May 2014 15:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [93.93.130.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB901A01A5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 15:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=52666 helo=mangole.lan) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1WkKqE-0001Cv-Lj; Tue, 13 May 2014 23:06:31 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <042901cf6d21$82133940$8639abc0$@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 23:06:29 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <271EFE91-DA13-4863-B45B-46E2032E217F@csperkins.org>
References: <CA+9kkMCeoA27gOw=6+oESFGptDrXYpXeux7yjBByHaApp7=-YA@mail.gmail.com> <042901cf6d21$82133940$8639abc0$@gmail.com>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: -28
X-Mythic-Debug: Threshold = On =
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/MEsa-3Vo4TBLCsBbI2cMfTKniJo
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-13
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 22:06:40 -0000

Hi Roni,

On 11 May 2014, at 15:01, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just nits
>  
> 1.       Section 8 last paragraph “RTP XR” should be “RTCP XR”
>  
> 2.       The last sentence in the paragraph after figure 1 “it it believed”
>  
> 3.       In section 12.2.2 bullet 4 “While is is clearly”.

Fixed, thanks.

> BTW: this case can be a self-view in the mixer case which may be a feature and not a bug. It may also be a loop-back.

In cases where the loop-back/self-view is desired, won’t a different SSRC be used to distinguish from an accidental loop?

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/