Re: [rtcweb] revisiting MTI

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Tue, 16 December 2014 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9B01A877D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:18:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h9MF1h03y4pN for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:18:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA1FF1A8757 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:17:58 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f791c6d00000617b-2d-54909374ad92
Received: from ESESSHC012.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 8B.4B.24955.47390945; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:17:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.175]) by ESESSHC012.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.54]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:17:56 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "Harald Alvestrand" <harald@alvestrand.no>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] revisiting MTI
Thread-Index: AQHQGUFjso9B1B7Olkyfz4ehEBRmYJySQOMAgAADoQCAAAP7AIAAQnmAgAAKSwCAABLBUA==
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:17:55 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D5E8C5A@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <548F0E28.8040503@andyet.net> <20141215192409.GN47023@verdi> <548F54A5.2060105@andyet.net> <CA+9kkMDNhRdbzCs9vrqDeD4CoWWK1xS5o0z3jL0DvNpDuLfCPw@mail.gmail.com> <548F5E22.2040605@andyet.net> <548F5F0E.4050100@nostrum.com> <548F5FB8.9010300@andyet.net> <548F646C.1050406@nostrum.com> <20141216150303.GT47023@verdi> <CABcZeBOAfuscG28PMAu8JJ4yAAt1-ohnuqCaeoa+jkpDkJhhpw@mail.gmail.com> <20141216152100.GU47023@verdi> <54905132.40105@alvestrand.no> <5B1166AB-A2EA-4F83-ABB2-8947D044B159@apple.com> <54909198.7040409@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <54909198.7040409@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.154]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D5E8C5AESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprBIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW7J5AkhBr+nSFvs+buI3eJYXxeb xdp/7ewW8/s/sjiweFyZcIXVY+vJH2weS5b8ZPKYtfMJSwBLFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAlfG+p8N jAUvIit+LDvJ3MC4JryLkYNDQsBE4lCbZxcjJ5ApJnHh3nq2LkYuDiGBI4wSz/c3MkI4Sxgl buz7zgbSwCZgIdH9TxukQUSgQKLlxFkmEJtZQF3izuJz7CC2sICKxMNr75khalQl7ny4xQ5h h0ks/DENzGYBit++2A7WyyvgK7F/dR8zxK6VLBJXz61nAUlwCmhL7J7UDWYzAl33/dQaqGXi EreezGeCuFpAYsme88wQtqjEy8f/WCFsJYlFtz9D1edLXOt7wAixTFDi5MwnLBMYRWchGTUL SdksJGWzgF5mFtCUWL9LH6JEUWJK90N2CFtDonXOXHZk8QWM7KsYRYtTi5Ny042M9VKLMpOL i/Pz9PJSSzYxAqPy4JbfqjsYL79xPMQowMGoxMNrsKA/RIg1say4MvcQozQHi5I478Jz84KF BNITS1KzU1MLUovii0pzUosPMTJxcEo1MMYXbVoR8edM15taa6koz7CHEXc3Whw48SlB6e/E nPfbjzpv7Bdpee87qaCPO2DHuqn8rSHce1PTd56yT2dx/xWcdjmoujozSCubeVXroTnsJxeK f2CvuMfCeWd94cnIw26P9WfsNGqXPLBs32TWW87u8neUE7YGPP16asXv92EBqj0zBRbllCix FGckGmoxFxUnAgDXtmjbqwIAAA==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/MJK6ad99GwmiIRzj1ZgJSpokePs
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] revisiting MTI
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:18:04 -0000

Hi,



The decision to use that terminology (browser, non-browser and compliant) was made during the first RTCWEB session at the same IETF meeting, when Harald presented the status of the overview draft.



I assume Harald will implement that decision into the next version of the overview draft.



Regards,



Christer


From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adam Roach
Sent: 16 December 2014 22:10
To: David Singer; Harald Alvestrand
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] revisiting MTI

On 12/16/14 13:33, David Singer wrote:

Except I can’t find the text “non-browser” in the referenced document.

Huh. I see the following (cf. <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-13#section-2.2><https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-13#section-2.2>):



   o  A WebRTC non-browser is something that conforms to the protocol

      specification, but does not claim to implement the Javascript API.

      This can also be called a "WebRTC device" or "WebRTC native

      application".


In terms of the text you cited about the relationship between terms, which is an outdated version of:


   All WebRTC browsers are WebRTC endpoints, so any requirement on a

   WebRTC endpoint also applies to a WebRTC browser.

If you think you see somewhere that we're imposing a requirement on an endpoint that doesn't *also* apply to a browser, please call it out explicitly.

If this is some oblique attempt to complain about the reference to the -12 version of the overview document [1]  by pretending to be daft [2]: you're not fooling anyone, so you can stop it. You may be misguided, but we all know that you're not stupid.

/a

____
[1] Rather than the -13 version that came out three days after *this* document
[2] As you did with the "Brower" typo