IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-08.txt

Barry Dingle <btdingle@gmail.com> Wed, 09 April 2014 11:41 UTC

Return-Path: <btdingle@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DAC1A0249 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 04:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oe5pSZ3b92yq for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 04:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5631A0242 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 04:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w61so2331286wes.29 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 04:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=W2Sf/iEwX4/wAkXlaQh5FDaDMD8cHvHSzP+m8T/q2vc=; b=Ciz6fSSIkCO6+7oQcNg7lpWklgCdlwLER/LBBCqXgLjOU5p0ECw07/FQKvXSrJymrp f8phPEzdJu9PLMv7IW22q+H4BzvCeV4YCZZs+KhNVMSwA1CzI2OctBbM2JIqP51HYArk BAhYXEAUMg9OX/2ZRKbQJBdw+ucDVPdBbYQCDHmD5P2pr7Cnhm18GbWzfJIbHObmLRBp CUfc9G/zmqPlnJKD75466FKUMAZav/3y/n7cux9Pe9T26U038+7CjQ+1lqSniL7uePsA Y27i4nqEtCqoZpSkI6B3zeQRXgskDeV2WEHXEw5vFuOfJUgEi70AgWmo7CNwx4LulLfT deRw==
X-Received: by 10.180.20.176 with SMTP id o16mr36962492wie.7.1397043705046; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 04:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.91.212 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 04:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D2B7AAB@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <20140409100258.9712.74771.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F09BCD44-1060-4DCB-A796-7A31F1C634DE@csperkins.org> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D2B7AAB@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
From: Barry Dingle <btdingle@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 21:41:25 +1000
Message-ID: <CAN=GVAvLNyw6m0_edBOSJhq_tAy0duCjKHtq4ed+rLwW5_U35A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec53f35f5c66cf704f69a9563"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/MJZSQ-1wg4vh4cplPyGHonTMW7Q
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-08.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:41:58 -0000

Hi,

If "WebRTC Data Channel" is to be used for other use-cases than just
WebRTC, then the Title needs to change.  But what do we call it?

Cheers,
Barry Dingle
Australia


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The WebRTC Data Channel will be used also for non-WebRTC applications (it
> is e.g. base for the CLUE Data Channel), where the must-use-SRTP rule does
> not necessarily apply.
>
> Having said that, I DO think that the draft text need to be more generic.
> WebRTC can be described as a use-case, but it shall be clear that the
> mechanism can also be used in other environments.
>
> Regards.
>
> Christer
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Colin Perkins
> Sent: 9. huhtikuuta 2014 14:01
> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-08.txt
>
> On 9 Apr 2014, at 11:02, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers
> Working Group of the IETF.
> >
> >        Title           : WebRTC Data Channels
> >        Authors         : Randell Jesup
> >                          Salvatore Loreto
> >                          Michael Tuexen
> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-08.txt
> >       Pages           : 15
> >       Date            : 2014-04-09
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   The Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group is charged
> >   to provide protocol support for direct interactive rich communication
> >   using audio, video, and data between two peers' web-browsers.  This
> >   document specifies the non-(S)RTP media data transport aspects of the
> >   WebRTC framework.  It provides an architectural overview of how the
> >   Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) is used in the WebRTC
> >   context as a generic transport service allowing WEB-browsers to
> >   exchange generic data from peer to peer.
>
> This talks about "(S)RTP" throughout, but the rtp-usage draft requires
> that SRTP be used for WebRTC, and disallows plain RTP. I think this draft
> could be simplified by changing "(S)RTP" to "SRTP" throughout.
>
> --
> Colin Perkins
> http://csperkins.org/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email