Re: [rtcweb] Decision confirmations needed

Bernard Aboba <> Mon, 22 March 2021 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579003A0825 for <>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 08:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HWMjyz4m7Njr for <>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 08:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB4C23A0816 for <>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 08:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id f16so21597275ljm.1 for <>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 08:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LrLcv/E6GQvsGCK7K9ltbKIIxgbORvxT3jewAOvzoaA=; b=KWFDstz1NxwNJJzf7Hvt8RvlLiNn3ZFQJQi3L6DrDLuHZO7ofkJnJG+1Z8DEaQS2Sd /2NKe2yGj1WmzjRLCuIwMZG8/1RPsy4sr32ROByIOrE26nXsXyw51DoG9S965xi1oII5 +NSRCGRSiu2mNIhMOJb3jGl/wUpTPE/RnlaFAP3Lwrh6RAMrhB5HExEFAEO6Grmi2OCJ uEhvQjYmmjqVcbgzs7qgyzZOZeqB3tMDPzC7CUIJCz+PjHRhZhjyfaBonwf2trSr2lzg WyhiGtu1A28epqc6V5opgBdsq8bQh969KsuRvYC0bgvbXMFU1Ejl8MJ0Gzw9QIUcBGy8 9YCw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LrLcv/E6GQvsGCK7K9ltbKIIxgbORvxT3jewAOvzoaA=; b=oBoS9QSHvFbqIM4fYqpKLv+k934S8C+B4krbX1JNNdJRMHDPWmTXXI/+g4vnX3+ET3 UUqe6pcbqmkv/3U4TPPQHXqo3C1D1FJtNzeDwtpuaFBGwelmCXgU5rYlfCU19OUdBDaY 5voh1LJrLnxLahr+jDD5LsBdXGt0cZ0AHZ63sJnLjKB4GfBm3e8hQ+YQw+fOPFAkrgkU LH2KkH4Kk21L3lMq15YUT5WEItDjLL5uHI49xREq7Mba6CLT5LxZ067GhuF8WwMISw22 k0MUouz/eofKJETqZ2hzp94dOW9Izmfutz7QrRNr/MqmN3FQ/7xVmF84XOLho2+Z4poB 9xfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533VxtC4TPaiPStjayheR0bh+H5PP1b/lsIPRjBno7GsUw72ztq1 bon6yiCaY0w8YvgK3bozLJZyo8+LSGWnCH+ZqVY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz8lzUr1sXEkSA76sthz/u1VFbbLofrzOBdSLBkkD3RiaTFUug23U2Il4ZlIFKhlbgb7Wil3bA8i4BuvDNrIK0=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b606:: with SMTP id r6mr68393ljn.327.1616426502169; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 08:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Bernard Aboba <>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 08:21:32 -0700
Message-ID: <>
To: Ted Hardie <>
Cc: RTCWeb IETF <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000077a92905be219f86"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Decision confirmations needed
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:21:48 -0000

I am ok with the decisions made at the meeting.

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 2:11 AM Ted Hardie <> wrote:

> At the recent meeting there were several decisions which need confirmation.
> First, the resolution of the core question of the mismatch between BUNDLE
> and JSEP was:
> * Switch BUNDLE to match JSEP [Christer volunteered to do it].
> If you object to this result, please send a message to the list explaining
> why and what you would like to see instead.
> For the mechanism to accomplish that, the group in the meeting agreed to:
> * Create a new "max-bundle-safe" [name TBD] with current
> "max-bundle-behavior". Document that "max-bundle" used to exist and now has
> unspecified and deprecated behavior.
> If you object to this result, please send a message to the list explaining
> why and what you would like to see instead. Note that if you object to the
> first point and your reason for the second objection is that you prefer
> something else there, you do not need to object again.
> On a functional basis the plan i  to re-rev JSEP in place rather than to
> do a patch draft.   If you object to that revision plan, please send a
> message to the list explaining why and what you would like to see instead.
> Christer will discuss the same thing for BUNDLE with the ADs and chairs;
> if you have an opinion on that, please send it to the ADs and chairs of
> both RTCWEB and MMUSIC.
> If you are okay with these results and did not voice your opinion at the
> meeting, please send your confirmation to the list.
> Thanks,
> Ted Hardie
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list