IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Consent alternative

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 05 December 2013 06:37 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5F81AE38A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:37:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18JYq6zDVOy6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:37:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFA71AE384 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:37:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w61so16294307wes.29 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:37:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=6yozo1/Jv3gBwKOlI7cuXKhZRpu+GTSKhVWbhwU7uK0=; b=RWfejCZFeQEfQXUV3ogMuZh3v6RYzF3NqXYHaatp5M2PgydW9OF2bkIVk3sXEZ2z2k I0/PAYV5kYqKhmJAlx3DVjpMFe8oTwnAeA47reFDDMi7YMIwVWybb5eAHOCfLZNfe0M+ CdcPuKqBO8FKLcgzg42D3w3fSGeSJ/ioi9iXJVvWOVPVtg9JHExq9ypv24oxj2ChrZmt bT1rVILTrX+qHchPi84nAn/51Gz0RNlKsktnkCSi3Sr7OtCAermtBernlEgNyI4A/eDp 4LnmAFfoZldzCuGzUpUt5Fh8OqyNfM7onPhXSl1QvWO+wlKse/8tdFkadl5KCX6vQLq0 md7g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.108.162 with SMTP id hl2mr10400588wib.56.1386225435458; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:37:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.134.195 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:37:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E721D8C6A2E1544DB2DEBC313AF54DE224374A87@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com>
References: <CABkgnnVNnT8uoWM8T=TqbTmy11CGTeHLP=_7z5KSMSpAsp9SyQ@mail.gmail.com> <52989933.6000907@ericsson.com> <CABkgnnUX3OFUyc5PXeN0ydykBwL0HyRuaigfJKMBbuWnuhnVJg@mail.gmail.com> <02F053C4-ADD9-40D4-BE58-AD9997CFF390@cisco.com> <CABkgnnWbf0WYsy9XLyqrg70YdbuePgHF=Yu0wnSLUW6iZB=Mzg@mail.gmail.com> <E721D8C6A2E1544DB2DEBC313AF54DE224374A87@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:37:15 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXhKsDcdm1Gn8kzv8JKendVxko05FvirXTkhvTTnQTSLQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: "Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)" <mperumal@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consent alternative
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 06:37:21 -0000

On 4 December 2013 20:48, Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
<mperumal@cisco.com> wrote:
> |Yes, almost.  If ICE restart didn't also correspond with a change in
> |ufrag/pwd it might.  As it stands, ICE restart and new victim look
> |exactly the same.
>
> RFC5245 section 9.1.1.1:
>    To restart ICE, an agent MUST change both the ice-pwd and the ice-
>    ufrag for the media stream in an offer.


My point exactly.  I don't like that part of RFC 5245 (though it's not
special in that regard, there are plenty of other points equally
worthy of contempt).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email