Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Wed, 28 September 2011 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FC721F8D47 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.636
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.636 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Aj+RMF3Mdqz9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049AE21F8D3C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5so9692838vws.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.89.177 with SMTP id bp17mr8862833vdb.447.1317226712054; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.118.143 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53C72381-DC23-4A6A-944C-B418791876B0@cisco.com>
References: <CAD5OKxtNjmWBz92bRuxka7e-BUpTPgVUvr3ahJGpmZ-U5nuPbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGSmz5T_F+SK2EoBQm6T-iRKp7dd4j8ZAF5JKdbbyomZQA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmO54HC+g9L_DYn4jtXAAbLEvS++qxKa6TNrLDREs9SeA@mail.gmail.com> <4E80984A.903@skype.net> <CALiegfmyvTb57WVooKryS-ubfcg+w5gZ+zfO1zzBLn3609AzaA@mail.gmail.com> <4E809EE6.2050702@skype.net> <CAD5OKxvUOadaU0dnB7-Ho9cZ92VY+4Owuhj7oKPCx9Jy1iwT1Q@mail.gmail.com> <C2DF2C51-B3F7-443D-A047-7E6FB03E6D20@phonefromhere.com> <CAOJ7v-3AJJcdrCKcH4AJmv_016sZtcOPOo8yCv3Va65eJogAkQ@mail.gmail.com> <53C72381-DC23-4A6A-944C-B418791876B0@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:18:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegf=nG+KXto9CXfn64CQSp3P5Lfm+S8c0xnA187Fhz=fcrQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:15:44 -0000

2011/9/28 Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>:
> Many service providers front end their services with an SBC for a wide variety of reasons - and that is the place they would likely run ICE Lite (note it's not even full ICE they need).

Just to add information about ICE Lite:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rescorla-mmusic-ice-lite-00

--------------
   During the design of ICE, many implementors expressed concern about
   the complexity of the protocol and the difficulty of implementing it.
   This draft specifies a compatible simplified subset of ICE called
   "ICE Lite" which is suitable for implementations which will always be
   operated with public IP addresses.  One particular environment where
   ICE Lite is intended to be useful is in SIP-PSTN gateways which are
   generally directly connected to the Internet.
--------------

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>