Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Fri, 30 March 2018 22:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9596127342 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 15:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TyvqVCHhHked for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 15:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x232.google.com (mail-qt0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3630126DFB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 15:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x232.google.com with SMTP id s48so10534148qtb.10 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 15:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+Q+0yVpXBXN1h3JpKoCh0qi0JEyIMv6TC3qBw3ct/9g=; b=KsT6IZ2TUeO0kB9laEp136K7W2pUYX+wwDBQosDtmusp1J9tqxlFfUhAghuAN1y27q oO2wAcs4CcDzK/2ononmfJKOlk/53trrCSVd848BJgdu0WzHe5vXFmqQ9AsPVPCXqMHu m7xBKtQeVta7iXfgpwuDw1ncrw6Y2DmVNGPkY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+Q+0yVpXBXN1h3JpKoCh0qi0JEyIMv6TC3qBw3ct/9g=; b=UIPe+mCE9ShD445LZ/vR2eFq/mMKLCqzHDslA6NPdhD5mMM3MNTDLcqQHyiSDmUDGF ca5kW9gaxdu/M3n51UsIKP4Lk0w4DbV7MGE/G0RnlsKcJ2fhGc/GhYnXCA4ZYARwbET7 UnfbIVdD1Agf51olXtx6zVowHwsZ1n0FZwD52aTBCQJlskSlXJxpmcp03xNrAWCGOJk6 1AGi1SeSAnFR7ueTyBB43uqJk7EWy1EBKKYf5fq4iYDDiDkfxJLDKdMuh02GKIwgECiH vuUKk6nk4fUtKm4yb0Lk/MzzRgE4Fyie+CsMJp+OF4XVd3GhgW9nb466uOq+JjjQaImR QprA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCvtMA9T6emp2AKiHD2z6LS+0Vu+/jSkjuv1TlVh1xbI1l/lT3W 2R4cIbA8nkN4aYpvjau+PyF5uA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+C6q32U5XgUuyI1PO7P+GSRzVD76qe31nDnWangc2ysokBCNELwfqWqxcXZgG3LJbBA1O+kw==
X-Received: by 10.200.27.3 with SMTP id y3mr1107013qtj.161.1522447930828; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 15:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.0.18] ([96.231.225.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm6019062qka.47.2018.03.30.15.12.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Mar 2018 15:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <1fceb3c4-35f3-34f7-de1d-79d5805e6d22@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 18:12:08 -0400
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org, Justin Uberti <juberti=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9517D601-D3E8-46E1-94E5-7EC29FD6319B@sn3rd.com>
References: <1D5B431C-801E-4F8C-8026-6BCBB72FF478@sn3rd.com> <63282b84-4493-3fcb-a95f-4afe17d96bb6@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOJ7v-1gTq+EEjb+-q-T-pABBW--rpNGegoj_d2_7f7AKGksCA@mail.gmail.com> <403713b4-31d4-9085-d639-d3f60935ed5a@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOJ7v-0ED-FK=JmSxBJYfM=PCdgY6kmbiq6aFLcP7OXugG07EA@mail.gmail.com> <e6938f7d-542d-736b-0a3d-9269d7dd06e5@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOW+2dv1ORz2tEkgDTvdM1DtgyOdgXqKU30T4QhLAp1NT+rirg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0tCcg3FdzyfSJ6Y3JaH-TivFf-Sey6+tD8BANJKsjqtQ@mail.gmail.com> <1fceb3c4-35f3-34f7-de1d-79d5805e6d22@gmail.com>
To: Lennart Grahl <lennart.grahl@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/MyuavsPlXF5uAxT1GU_Aed9hwrk>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 22:12:14 -0000


> On Mar 29, 2018, at 23:48, Lennart Grahl <lennart.grahl@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm fine with the modes, I don't have a strong opinion on whether or not
> an IETF document should include some form of "consent". But I do have a
> problem with the suggestion to use getUserMedia. Can we maybe remove it?

As the draft shepherd, I’m trying to figure out how to draw this WGLC to a close all in the hopes that we can help each other get this RTCweb WG ship docked.

As far as dropping the getUserMedia suggestion, I’m a little hesitant to just drop it at this late date.  That suggestion has been in the draft since October 2016 and it’s stood the test of a couple of WG reviews; not last calls mind you but there’s been plenty of time for folks to say get that outta there.  And technically, it’s just a suggestion with no normative language.  So … maybe a happy middle ground is to have another suggestion so that there’s more than one potential mechanism?

spt