[rtcweb] Sanjay Mishra's choices (was: Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives)

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Wed, 25 December 2013 05:48 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CDD1AE227 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 21:48:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.929
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.929 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5rHVBiLsShPF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 21:48:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BED1AE207 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 21:48:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id rBP5mK9d032349; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 14:48:21 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.134]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 4f22_3fb7_293ec6c0_6d28_11e3_aeb5_001e6722eec2; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 14:48:19 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [133.2.210.1]) by itmail2.it.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8A8BF54F; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 14:48:20 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <52BA718E.1030105@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 14:47:58 +0900
From: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Mishra, Sanjay" <sanjay.mishra@verizon.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com> <900A1E2059ADB149B905E3C8FA0046A62C82365151@FHDP1LUMXC7V23.us.one.verizon.com>
In-Reply-To: <900A1E2059ADB149B905E3C8FA0046A62C82365151@FHDP1LUMXC7V23.us.one.verizon.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: [rtcweb] Sanjay Mishra's choices (was: Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 05:48:30 -0000

Hello Sanjay, others,

I have a clarifying question below.

On 2013/12/24 23:44, Mishra, Sanjay wrote:
> Please see responses for video codec alternatives below.
>
> Thanks
> Sanjay

[snip]

> 3.    All entities MUST support both H.264 and VP8
>
> a.    Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: YES

[snip]

> 10.  All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, H.261}
>
> a.    Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: NO
>
> b.    Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize them:
>
> o   Do not support possible outcome of VP8 and H.261 as MTI

Given that you are in favor of 3, and surprised at the NO here, and even 
more surprised at your justification. What's the problem if, under this 
option, some entities (not you) decide to implement VP8 and H.261, and 
communicate among themselves using either of these two?

It looks to me like there's either a fundamental issue for you that 
nobody else has mentioned yet, or there is a misunderstanding, and it 
would be great if you could clarify.

Regards,   Martin.