Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2B821F883F for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:19:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.512 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vAzyG765nIEd for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com (senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com [62.134.46.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F51D21F8841 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MCHP064A.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.37.63]) by senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com (Server) with ESMTP id 50C6C1EB84B1; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:19:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from MCHP058A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.55]) by MCHP064A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.63]) with mapi; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:19:36 +0200 From: "Hutton, Andrew" To: Magnus Westerlund , "rtcweb@ietf.org" Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:19:34 +0200 Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Consensus call regarding media security Thread-Index: Ac0M8kOUeqEsZNWCSMKEFgS7iyjaIgAy90KQ Message-ID: <101C6067BEC68246B0C3F6843BCCC1E31296C4CC7B@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> References: <4F732531.2030208@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <4F732531.2030208@ericsson.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consensus call regarding media security X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:19:38 -0000 I agree that there was clear consensus on mandating the use of SRTP but it = was not clear to me what the consensus is regarding the use of SRTP with a = null cipher. Does the statement "there was overwhelming consensus that all = RTP packets SHALL be protected by SRTP" mean that the null cipher will not = be allowed? Regards Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Magnus Westerlund > Sent: 28 March 2012 16:50 > To: rtcweb@ietf.org > Subject: [rtcweb] Consensus call regarding media security >=20 > WG, >=20 > In todays RTCWEB WG meeting there was discussion around media security > mechanism. In this meeting there was some clear consensus in the > meeting which we would like to confirm on the list. >=20 > The first was that there was overwhelming consensus that all RTP > packets SHALL be protected by SRTP. >=20 > Secondly that no one objected against making DTLS-SRTP a mandatory to > implement and the default keying mechanism. Additional mechanisms are > not precluded. >=20 > WG participants may state their position regarding these consensus > calls > until 12th of April when the chairs will declare the final consensus. > If > you where present in the meeting room and comment on this, please > indicate that. >=20 > Best Regards >=20 > Magnus Westerlund > For the WG chairs >=20 > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb