Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Wed, 19 June 2013 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C986521F9ABD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.089, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fqjnV0hlsUdc for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-f169.google.com (mail-pd0-f169.google.com [209.85.192.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C5021F9C69 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id y10so5324465pdj.28 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=VUynfzAyR1+VOBzSABOlbzBz7rMQ6syKCXv+9ejJxTI=; b=Eg43nO/iPPsEh2sudZ0aTCIZb16Ch3KFQunM76HVKcgScZvDJlmHOjegGVmvh3RWf2 pUeASztJ5QOTkMrXH0nLhT1VwIbAFez+0k5cgiPMvNlLU5dTi6xSiSu28v0Jdxu7PCmJ qnsiGJvLHWENnv5Y8kFpbsDIu2NJ4k3BxESvY1aDu1wqOUY06FH8KEnikVM0wRE/9ysG p7CthUMDy+zoXfU6Xr2eP1o5kyOUKc+Ov5rT1da9+9RctXyiGJUvCDn1jPgcS99z+ux/ BzY9sSe9sVNVfNLmVaW+FYmDOnOFXd8anBbv3y4tMo2cgSIVTIBtWFW/KaoX40Y74ZS8 zemQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=VUynfzAyR1+VOBzSABOlbzBz7rMQ6syKCXv+9ejJxTI=; b=EBF7n8itVgXl5VMfyud3VFhaDRE90kDWUMXIZpM75xsZdnb6WaxPCUvjr3cxEQKJ1c vfw5B3DwrQ8gnRoVQcUIJUfegTYLaoBT1EFvVYXjIqDgX+uJTZwtr1W7MxXMRyWSYe1m bLQRtihNJFubDT2grb6q0bknUyOfU/JV2470y3rQVj88e1Wo2Ve6BnEvmzv6awqj5Aq0 6CL8+Z6aHOwDMZbeaSRFaS5s/EpvZ6vGOIzT/WE1qogJjknTLlwRrIBP4g6MTThYRo87 YtAPCPdtF6Lklgi9KWoyXwvgXT9iAnFWtj5qq1Z1CuYzgb1TVQBfBehPS1Tl+59OPcnQ CIAg==
X-Received: by 10.68.163.165 with SMTP id yj5mr3746160pbb.141.1371662009320; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.88.8 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegf=SiPkCD6b1Z+hkgkbtT1bbxtytWyYRxH3CUGDvJOztRg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDk2L3SBPC08WU_5RcL16-Wzv8Mocj3-Qzmxz2E24ERGg@mail.gmail.com> <51C0C1A0.9010107@nostrum.com> <CAJrXDUGqSvsosZJhcRR-kCwEX1g_wvPnSZPmmcNwggk+Z9WNCA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFNGKvWHw-yqeApEdTeuqMNPTDxvdKZ2DuzANmcR2y2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AE500@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfk39prkSinDCisSqOAD8yJZuGUwLAMBabao7eHuhnAYcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUHe=vu2695xAkg2tKvQ7J5JNqraHCpY0rKx5rDQ0xCpiA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=GbR3K0dzMkaMWu88WdNY4JWQOmDPKeNfZQNuC5d4bog@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUHG7ENOu12SkRpXOik3ArEShPHAJhtOwYyR3UaSDvQFOA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=SiPkCD6b1Z+hkgkbtT1bbxtytWyYRxH3CUGDvJOztRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:12:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUF6uujp2jYCJgxp4kTctAFDWBBU-bWhJp4iMNDuc6A+3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86d556d164cd04df84f299
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnakXwqtTMdAlhwHVG38bHho2m0QKOi6tJet/BLh2Oft9tPT8WvzLffPJQcf44B7YangjrwZ20UkHGoKJSLqG12u6ZUQAnWWXtseVlXpcVF6FX5+0y1nM/2KngFEI/DRaH+knkcmj9XU9qdUTDOP3EVre6AbABPRZBLrmHjLK4A+lKVYrgN2j+BDar51vk1o8rikImK
Cc: "rtcweb_ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:13:38 -0000

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

> 2013/6/19 Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>om>:
> > But generally, anything beyond the most basic uses of the API requires at
> > least some SDP hackery, and advanced uses require a lot.
>
> Hi Peter, most of the solutions in your mail are basically based on
> "blob SDP parsing/mangling/hackery". Can we agree that the current API
> is a pain?:)
>
>
>
Of course.  That's why I made a proposal that attempts to lessen the pain
(the NoPlan JS API).  I'm trying to help you :).


>  --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>
>