[rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport parameter issue
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 15 February 2019 22:56 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA79131130 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:56:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VBhwdToxrw8Q for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:56:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x134.google.com (mail-it1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9BCD131129 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:56:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x134.google.com with SMTP id y184so28053557itc.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:56:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=l8sQPwe37FrdFeQx6aQds7QJeQM6e08Tle2FpLOvX4U=; b=CpbKd0E5vMfkAN/IXr5g/ZfC+QQvJLSuEQiaL1EF7h2NRzejtA8aWZbvY9Otw7Ndiw 6pAo1wCyq/WJLrLH9RsgqNFqWTVKYrQ20V3ExPcF74iAJdzI1d3HCybPTR6sNLJVQP5E XgEMpiNfQdXHhLK6dwqwxoLu/xWf8gMT0ad851g6lD61OVSPbGT1NCx1zSFO0SjKFH+j ypcS8X9ovDt8bT1+vRJBnNo7KR9AXNWK45rexnoBUXBDnOJphhVEpgd0nhaDtSpVjTiz AKb21ue2kYshTgvNHpLqBrV08GT/Xifk9ddS5Q2AUEnzq0hgtlhIh5ue+uHDoB66BJ6Z +T0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=l8sQPwe37FrdFeQx6aQds7QJeQM6e08Tle2FpLOvX4U=; b=m6sRCLaLgp6M9U0s/Jut/L7gC6tcqN51sz28FDrMOjr7rLMgP/mo+5gKYUctAu5ye1 5Z8y58Yue7i+K3a0YDP8RDEaDEicAcJXy/zx5cEfOvr80HeenHgk0k2cYhYAtUqsooDV y/d9TJfgNjpg70PYlK/kr7EuReVVsTHShU3YdRoDypRGzxZ9scxRgjGmL8JVLW/4XKrv n/wJFCAux3dfXujVeabMdDSR+nIGWudHmBh6ZVfWPo7ChGoU/S7ihHAEeRuYSS/rVC+p eXxYyOcXIU1m75GKrJsCzXWD1iDoHvtSJWmaldYFG0CdiaXiHUcJlxwulrwzMLyyFjO3 P9aw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuar0Fv7lgu9KTV6/mJtpqvixpHq365R1szcnIN6lNbElwwcvE4I vXHjMxISFEYy4YIg1RwtAZDRZSYes6x+fmyd3VDtXphpdkA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbQUGGIxVQy+LkugAh3eqzyAN4v2ocDTk4Bg0MgNNEpW7PEzBoxCrTnTE0/VPjZcNNv/93ak2Y3g7GyOjQTVU8=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:cd11:: with SMTP id g17mr6772154jaq.79.1550271401479; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:56:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:56:15 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMDMMfEU2QE9AkPXsCgHp1gB=X6_-jAKvH6FsWhqNkV_Kg@mail.gmail.com>
To: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000030d2f40581f6b0ac"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/N7oh9i0vEWrRsQtfuk0FjPSYh5o>
Subject: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport parameter issue
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 22:56:45 -0000
The chairs believe that there was rough consensus among those responding to make the change in: https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/jsep/pull/863 Given the state of the document, it will be the Area Director's call as to how much of the post-working group approval process must be re-done. Authors, please wait on his direction before publishing a new version with this merged. Regards, Ted and Sean
- [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE tra… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE… Christer Holmberg