Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8475E21F9F5E for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:28:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.159 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.159 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.183, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y66XSHd0Vagi for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:28:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AE321F9F47 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:28:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id p60so8266282wes.41 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:28:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=9Ueypkf8TDhbmXULsElaf4BJCkDvdHIA/dDJqyEiol4=; b=C9GlKxwTUkE+I9yXq+NulDFISBCk5kBa6YIBFgH7Z1r1a4TN5mBhFaejiubVHjl3UT B0JdB34O41rYQwqfQC5qkuGuVwc8fTaxpk7NQeTmwltEDgk0AlKTkkDC8EhRqBcCzYjs sIeaoXgSPhNlfAJz+GpuDwieDBOl/7t3tJFCdgkLggUW68z/5XE7wRZmDBOvyeZhv9TI +eEubgng3nmLOB6Y/zX7yibJq5kn/YFJAs87jZq4AxuRWEUGhmU73Fora2PNh12bBqsR SOBbS9tvmcN9zLblN1JbhoD44m0RxARUu1M7TRoC6LyAoN+aw4K/t+28jns99UQL8CFU SCxg== X-Received: by 10.194.179.129 with SMTP id dg1mr25532583wjc.38.1373653700215; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ve0-x235.google.com (mail-ve0-x235.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c01::235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h8sm4959304wie.1.2013.07.12.11.28.19 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:28:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ve0-f181.google.com with SMTP id db10so8534273veb.12 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:28:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.235.69 with SMTP id uk5mr24827881vec.17.1373653698075; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.221.45.71 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.221.45.71 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:28:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 20:28:18 +0200 Message-ID: From: Emil Ivov To: Cullen Jennings Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6c2c4b7f75e04e154acf0 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn2PTqsucCIG2I2EVi/Prj1KsyduVnm5NbK3KmeT3E0PUlAlGcFEixmSUEqI7G22SmQwwV4 Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org Subject: Re: [rtcweb] division of responsibilities (was: Draft agenda for IETF 87) X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:28:29 -0000 --047d7bd6c2c4b7f75e04e154acf0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Just to be clear: use of SDP O/A is precisely the intended topic of the slot we are requesting. --sent from my mobile On Jul 12, 2013 7:42 PM, "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" wrote: > > On Jul 12, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Martin Thomson > wrote: > > > With all respect > > to the chairs, that's not something I trust them to rule on at this > > point. > > just to be clear, I don't think the RTCWeb chairs have done anything > remotely close to a ruling on this. We have taken censuses calls on the use > of 3264 O/A. > > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > --047d7bd6c2c4b7f75e04e154acf0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Just to be clear: use of SDP O/A is precisely the intended t= opic of the slot we are requesting.

--sent from my mobile

On Jul 12, 2013 7:42 PM, "Cullen Jennings (= fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com&= gt; wrote:

On Jul 12, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
=A0wrote:

> With all respect
> to the chairs, that's not something I trust them to rule on at thi= s
> point.

just to be clear, I don't think the RTCWeb chairs have done anything re= motely close to a ruling on this. We have taken censuses calls on the use o= f 3264 O/A.


_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
= https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
--047d7bd6c2c4b7f75e04e154acf0--