Re: [rtcweb] Resolving whether to support additional key management methods

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 05 October 2012 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6885C21F8440 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oRHwSx6bWgb8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7987E21F8435 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id fl11so2645370vcb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 11:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=YdMNaTYwZUkxyBm3SkpD9/XigHwaLFgiSfWX4AIpUDA=; b=tMtvTc8n/rOmxMFmSTd/6AasuwvThas8cRdH1TcGUh0sJZgA3FD1hr5ISY+oO4dq1b TlIDzxV/mU+lndEkH8oixrOHe+7vr0Kgvd7KLo5h6fUZ37js0ZoW0x7+o3XaCBchcBTC PnPErUr0KvHRdBlGz+Ye+1e70Ey6qE68X/Qb9Fhn54uLtUj97CJMgBhSkNRUYyXq4C5z ffojxVERbZsw4V2PiWs+4/6822CGdFt6aH5mxYE/cPgLnSdZJqzL+rmbu92E+aL+0mry tOrQLE9OplPqA+ddd7+xAHr5qKv0xwyucukbVcRn21DcCWbaLmfgVyCOIzzxX8Uw44Ti KzGA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.220.7 with SMTP id hw7mr5592635vcb.17.1349460846976; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 11:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.245.39 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <506F14AA.5020802@alvestrand.no>
References: <CA+9kkMD6vG1e0eqgk75fiu_QFqEDJb6QaEqTTWE9n5LnTmFz_A@mail.gmail.com> <506F14AA.5020802@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:14:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMAbxBjh8ksq2jC3cpx3v3neE9DZogmYN_DtA+ygCrhMZw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Resolving whether to support additional key management methods
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 18:14:08 -0000

On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> On 10/04/2012 05:32 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:

> What is the proposed outcome space of this discussion?
> We already have a decision of "MUST do DTLS(-SRTP)",

Yes, and we are not proposing to re-discuss whether this a MUST; we
want to focus on whether there are additional proposals which have
consensus.


> but I'm not sure what
> the other questions are.
>
> I could see the result of the SDES discussion being one of:
>
> - MUST do SDES
> - SHOULD do SDES
> - MAY do SDES
> - MUST NOT do SDES
>
> I also see another discussion around EKT, which could conclude
>
> - MUST do EKT
> - MAY do EKT
> - MUST NOT do EKT
>
> (I don't see much point in "SHOULD do EKT" - it doesn't give
> interoperability, so is not much more useful than MAY)
>
> Are there other things on the table? Are both of the above on the table?
>

Both of the above discussions have already started, and they have not
concluded; we want to conclude them.  If there are other proposals,
they can be brought forward in the context of this discussion,
provided they do not start with "let's ditch DTLS-(SRTP)".

regards,

Ted


>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Ted, Cullen, Magnus
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb