IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Transports: RFC 6062 support

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Thu, 06 March 2014 13:24 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27BF01A025D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:24:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.925
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.925 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e45N--Maetzd for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:24:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-x22e.google.com (mail-ve0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA551A0073 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:24:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f174.google.com with SMTP id oz11so2562192veb.5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 05:24:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=5AWaJxptrXYmFt9m6sz7O6WI0uGo6bYH6p3arYihuDQ=; b=Xl7435TjFbt1Hzd77SGsjnaP8kfDNcbUa0v67nZ4pj8JNhKsd9QGU07yL6dhdbxBtX qYwP5KcXGtCGTXRteNR+nwdjBCJMw4MXrPej59vE1y42HecJaIe0I+vRrY36sYlu1Gv7 hbkpog5cVpZ/QDy7qjPS/JiZr6nPG9caJIWbrTYPd97xieWcgpoLR+omgV6+8X46W6a7 iNlt2gZoKWhLS2xsKO5g6p8ZRvRA6EvMF14tidFXKm4BdeVBxH8bfklG/JnhFOWprHIJ SPmFzbqYvjXuqE/4foHPMVH4lFBCh3yecdAH3QPgs/zd+4w+o0+8SnytLE2WwIPRZRfm yyyQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=5AWaJxptrXYmFt9m6sz7O6WI0uGo6bYH6p3arYihuDQ=; b=Ld0/aDRoAqlSTGMnjQ/ZVyOw+JXkeL1/6FqdgMHm2P+5Qljt4ZM6AjTjjEo2EBpQWQ uZHKNNyAkUuNkf/c7E0FRShMoCgfH/cBHnSIcgVaa3crGHeqc6fhZldTZTm1fOlbw18T 6kBEUHXaL08HygZRj09I52Uncz+gkGJihdBBgV69AJWowpFCk0gBu3j26WSbyK26smGE s0lVwblpuiqG1uORYrtg6FJvaLdVqeH5iqQV8np6F9EfG9u7rbyBTQGSDerGT9aEz/RD HtnbmAyyE4zGxGwUr0XIIxY1WeqmLi0nYi1DBc6r5c5L767fDLdlnHLbD/WPraCU65Qk TEpw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnRBOfVJ6gTd/baeLPwuQOZA6j90lPVJluymbKmBzNhGVflSG6zGe72BgeTxNMkkCsJEqnd4sln7SviibBH3Y3gCjWmPkQgZydjbuIqHF6PiOmcUtvH7p4L9O3Ijdgya0gBgTnxWu6XHAnjv81Ih/S5pE/QrPtRT/Y2Hz7SoQRnsjbBwJu594rLVmhzvYjZRWhcj1TN
X-Received: by 10.220.67.18 with SMTP id p18mr5109104vci.14.1394112251106; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 05:24:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.26.43 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:23:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <531874A4.6010908@viagenie.ca>
References: <CAOJ7v-0-U8ycUYcOwRGxgZVDQmdPMXC4Qt7F+uAn29AGOepX7w@mail.gmail.com> <CABAmMA00xA1TbXsQRYYnuukYyurZzdG8nKr95aT4gxHxQtNiMw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0xiG-omwmpXm9koakab+EDFo7W=gW+WY4fGS6QVKfALQ@mail.gmail.com> <4A409D06-511D-424D-8285-E38B3E08292D@skype.net> <53177A5E.7030704@viagenie.ca> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A4844FABAB0B@TK5EX14MBXC296.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <53183BBB.3040409@viagenie.ca> <CAOJ7v-1ZN=N5w3hFRkrC+LzarGFnt0qimcJbkTxWy6z0vWZFDg@mail.gmail.com> <531874A4.6010908@viagenie.ca>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:23:50 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-3xasrFG5WVXPd_hA0=OoxvKbAhL2V4erYt7-kGt_JrtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b343f9a812df704f3f00d9e"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/NWlMz-YENUEHfWP9YL1WSRS2BfE
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Transports: RFC 6062 support
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:24:17 -0000

True. But in trying to wrap up this thread, can we agree that TURN TCP
candidates are a SHOULD NOT?


On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca
> wrote:

> Le 2014-03-06 13:11, Justin Uberti a écrit :
> > I would expect that corp or ISP servers would also be located very close
> > to the endpoint.
>
> Right, but my point is that we still don't have a way for those corp- or
> ISP-provided servers to be discovered by the endpoint. We had a draft
> presented in TRAM yesterday, but it was not adopted. So I guess we're at
> a point where we need ideas.
>
> Simon
> --
> DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
> NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
> STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email