Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB Interim 80.5 Meeting Minutes - June 8, 2011

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Tue, 28 June 2011 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABA511E80CA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.745
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.745 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.147, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xvZ9w3c4dD+C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492C211E8140 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pwj5 with SMTP id 5so478496pwj.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MLhTTbCyCyNVRx29gwr5vtgZHV9A5Qog5vgY1GBMvK8=; b=lIL5lNvD0JdcCc+9WRYrZ4AnZzvkVGp3w86zOiWdYDCLwGa2Xvxisx3Cjpj+9DD4+s ZTqWEvbaXbHbCHZVJCG79G5qsL0NnPrxNS86p48ary2gsGODYiYgqzjxxuylt6XDpVxd 1TqSebNzWy/Zqd7EehupMug+HtVbncVvuSGvk=
Received: by 10.68.23.100 with SMTP id l4mr3931248pbf.358.1309292040980; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] ([70.133.70.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x1sm358810pbb.50.2011.06.28.13.13.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E0A35E3.2040307@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:13:23 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110505 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <E04941F7-A0DB-4AEF-A6F3-E6BF0055891B@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E04941F7-A0DB-4AEF-A6F3-E6BF0055891B@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB Interim 80.5 Meeting Minutes - June 8, 2011
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:14:02 -0000

On 06/28/2011 08:34 AM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> [...] The group agrees that avoiding Voice Hammer and cross-protocol attacks is required; if there are ways to do that without ICE, fine, but those are key requirements.
>    
If ICE relates to X11's ICE (which I doubt on specific screens and 
drivers), then may I hint at the mote method of IPv4 "land" inside IPv6 
(or other protocol) "mote". The concept is ridiculous in single core 
systems with centralized-peripheral, yet may be cents for those that 
keep hardwired bridges. The key point is the is-"land" only knows IPv4, 
so remains unaffected by its float among IPv6.

I wouldn't doubt the mechanics of ICE-walls continue to stretch so far 
into court to quietly determine "this" is the same as "this" in the 
business or not (i.e. stationary battery industry and mobile drive 
systems, or mobile battery industry and stationary drive systems, ... 
endless).

-- 
--- http://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering
Ag-Biotech, Virtual Reality, Consultant