IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-jennings-rtcweb-qos (Re: Call for adoption of QoS draft)

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Thu, 20 September 2012 08:17 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9D921F845F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 01:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.252, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1PGTbIxjCAMp for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 01:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F40621F8452 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 01:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.80,453,1344236400"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="691838605"
Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 20 Sep 2012 01:17:38 -0700
Received: from vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.76.239]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q8K8Hcc2012261 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 01:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.46]) by vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.239]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 01:17:38 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-jennings-rtcweb-qos (Re: Call for adoption of QoS draft)
Thread-Index: AQHNj160A+7JjlEmH0OG6UCTgBP8bZeTZ2YA
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:17:37 +0000
Message-ID: <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E906888D6F@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBo10T=EgRXmkeB1vfB6MdUMVeWUpZowoXdP=E_+rm+mQ@mail.gmail.com> <504DF5EF.7070602@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <504DF5EF.7070602@alvestrand.no>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.106.53.51]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BA89BD7C-40E9-47D7-AD80-12E513FCE62C"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-jennings-rtcweb-qos (Re: Call for adoption of QoS draft)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:17:40 -0000

Hi,

agree that the QCI stuff is probably not useful to discuss.

The DSCP content is almost fully redundant with what's in RFC4594 (which is in the references but not cited). And RFC4594 has a much better discussion on what DiffServ is and isn't.

For WLAN, 802.11e is what you want to point to, I guess.

So this doc - if it's even needed - could be MUCH shorter, by basically just saying "read RFC4594 and map RTCweb flows into the classes defined there like this" and do the equivalent for 802.11e.

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email