Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface

Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Sat, 20 July 2013 02:10 UTC

Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D2421E8056 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 19:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.765
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.765 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.212, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6vG+-OrT8U65 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 19:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x22e.google.com (mail-pb0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC90211E81CC for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 19:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id rq2so5039959pbb.19 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 19:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=q+Cs3e+DYY4tQb2ptbSrUG3RkdkWtyH3M9zpmrvC7tU=; b=Bfzd6EE1RlAozONLt9diklc6TplfwtxnImK92Gnq9LcGgkpVAPXmdwLi01z+91D7eq cb1VlkV/cTMuG3q5/BUsys/j/LiOVj+c8z97skbIW+FCPaMQYzf5mIf34gpTKcpswMih a1Q8hdtLo3jDTwWI6AkpRFzE1i17dYNqaISzTbEJnOiL5qoGeeZbMElApRJs20pqqdsT +oRr3p70IGfR1qP7uWRTbePZ/F/4bbTrfBxTBGxvoLFXRZDTsQFNekDCZyE/y+qoEWZ9 Xp3xjgikDVqJ5zrf9pF0Hqzl5DkMxnchyzkBLKCdQtecgXTTbAjC0DlXBQsye2r6ZrVA 16lw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=q+Cs3e+DYY4tQb2ptbSrUG3RkdkWtyH3M9zpmrvC7tU=; b=D48ufgeCetruUhm5eO0P4u8+9K42EeNuQaIgLd4iLzE/85z822SFu4jh+rXrZY0GKw ZRG/xR6w7mM7tHL0GueU3OYFaLoKij0Alq/AkHSjDHvO7KunBSkC07wLzaP81OCgC5IL 8UcvxXbS6+ljS5vLCaUZDrQ81jX+PywYsG9WLHVGYcQHcyoeQWNpUzbLXJfIvmTEfEU4 vWQ6MWqce1u2DZQDFnz60mTCoDk0cfPxgSU80UIjJ5/WdaOMt08kZkPtaeNC2qRJBWSu TlnCagjpfvvpBaA3xTqBfUCfZ3NdanDYQh3PRhgOOUVCdZdOJHP9yaNW0GkU4x2gqvg6 EbkA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.104.196 with SMTP id gg4mr20310817pbb.25.1374286226474; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 19:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.78.195 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 19:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.78.195 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 19:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1CFEEBBF-DD98-4EDA-9595-F4E3ACB8A94F@iii.ca>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHOZf21aXgQMrdjTV8Fok+fVp-2SuhTra0JGy0Jq=Wi0Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHp8n2mNdNiXCCNUdEvKgAsh_pPn=jNs+56VCg4PMKbUmOGztQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUZMAuDocwZWXn9a+Xj3kkcX0uyRgjDmy-hQxpTDKWj3w@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30CF49@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfmiRsOXL97XDzMRQ_Vvbk9zaDBBvCPxr_=zbDJbnMZ_8A@mail.gmail.com> <E795F35A-B0A5-4BD8-B807-C97B76EC586B@iii.ca> <CAJrXDUHi3Rs4ioWqX4-ACF4crfDJT5Z71pvzzQvW_HqGqUH0VQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFmODfuLvaPJL8niP480fp0BwPBX7nYpQARRAogHOc7uQ@mail.gmail.com> <1CFEEBBF-DD98-4EDA-9595-F4E3ACB8A94F@iii.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 19:10:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUGVjgB3wmoKjdkdsJ7zKi1SFUNWBuj_NUPLbdC0a-2Mcg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6705b95989f604e1e7f209
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnRtIDJAh/ScSeeKw8ymyFae56FGpaAJIr2m9LzRgCjc5E6BXG8hXt1DRSYQ5Zh+OVO6B+/erZlWOK294I2QTgaUwB4L5f8hSR2gPeaeI1Qi/+3scLo3hicCu8Yy40SV9sCAZKILV0YT5pZ8Lqpx5P44Q7Wvvvthg76AuOx3z+4/HsBDgH+JsCWL8vQX1y8RmLYUC93
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 02:10:28 -0000

Like I said when I first sent the summary, anyone is welcome to make a
different summary from the raw data, or collect their own data.  I haven't
been around long enough to know how to categorize people and whose input is
considered valuable and whose isn't, so I ignorantly gave everyone equal
weight.  So if you'd like, you can filter out  Bernard and recalculate.

On Jul 19, 2013 6:52 PM, "Cullen Jennings" <fluffy@iii.ca>; wrote:

>
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>; wrote:
>
> > You're surprised that the first web developers that try out WebRTC and
> have feedback have experience with SIP and VoIP?  We shouldn't find that
> surprising, nor should we discount their feedback because of it.
>
> I was not saying that feedback from folks like Bernard Aboba was not
> useful, of course it can be. I was just noting the sample set.