IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)

Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> Wed, 07 September 2011 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E48121F8DF9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.368
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.368 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.231, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CDjxGQNqlYm6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.skype.net (mx.skype.net [78.141.177.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC5B21F8DF8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.skype.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F25D7FD; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:05:43 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=skype.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mx; bh=mmNPLtz5Zf6kul EH+uTGKglCKl8=; b=M6fpoeP1bNqn/Ma3KlQaPDUZqEKKKWwS3/8nFRmITeFYvE AlNgrLeDLzns6zS6MWqYeqjOiC7GUXKMLTr29Y0/IEdt2L4uoK7NERcnRsPqNtev Lo/VVz2TJTTeRccw87W0U3M/ECiGBzvtmK8Dofk+JPaR6V4t4SjYFVwNhThAo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=skype.net; h=message-id:date:from :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mx; b=E4mYupjC0Lj2WNzKbqhn3B ineDYRkQVJ5zLuroHN7+eQQrgeez4F62/ANAHnrWSKGDU2x7oF1bVPBDA5GVykic WR3pDwLOgw7BclVAWybatmK0sju+2vOwpi73YJqGQe11LjD+BHt8D5LDYw7SGuQh idKY6iTL10UW7oK5Y2sSE=
Received: from zimbra.skype.net (zimbra.skype.net [78.141.177.82]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DABA7F6; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:05:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B74A35081D8; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:05:43 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lu2-zimbra.skype.net
Received: from zimbra.skype.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.skype.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DqGkHfaw59j3; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:05:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Matthew-Kaufman-Air.local (50-0-2-20.static.sonic.net [50.0.2.20]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C90335081E6; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:05:42 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E67EAB4.20706@skype.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:05:40 -0700
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
References: <CAM_kxqci51=BnUFe-67Qs4eCxtGY50HDsRPrLjYULnBZJoH0Ow@mail.gmail.com>, <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF5106436F@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <BLU152-W72696F07F16816B1B267593100@phx.gbl> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51064707@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <4E659576.1000301@skype.net> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F0868@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <4E666785.7040409@skype.net> <4E67513C.3030600@alvestrand.no> <4E677CB8.40203@skype.net> <4E677D4F.8050105@skype.net> <BCB6B78C-52A4-4525-8C37-AEE936821675@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BCB6B78C-52A4-4525-8C37-AEE936821675@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 22:03:54 -0000

On 9/7/11 8:00 AM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2011, at 8:18 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>
> And note that this is directly parallel to the "innovate like Gmail" discussion. It is trivial for Gmail to change the look and feel and behavior of the "delete" button to implement an email paradigm of "keep everything, search to find it" (and have it work the same way no matter who the browser vendor is)... but this wouldn't have been the case if Gmail were forced to use the browser's built-in IMAP implementation.
> again - as I have mentioned before, that a silly analogy. I know it is rhetorically nice but seriously, why do you think it is a reasonable parallel?
>
"Baking a phone into the browser" is exactly the same as "baking an IMAP 
client into the browser".

What some have asked for is an API as simple as "sipPhone.call(<sip 
address>)" and "sipPhone.hangup()", and that's what I'm addressing.

Matthew Kaufman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email