IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-00.txt

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Sun, 11 July 2021 03:45 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25BC3A1573 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 20:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=telurix.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yxfxJom_Dt-m for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 20:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51CE23A1571 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 20:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id z25so8278174qto.12 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 20:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QZRyAWntgV27ZkgnH1cRVVFnRTHdJDBD6OGBv7Owrqo=; b=d77g8fC46gobdYqAK8jo6HuYsRajIbGw51BJDp2iaDTbnWxTdSH6YrseCtWwgh77C1 3Gl4eyk7dmRUx90KL4HyXbiUi6fCrwN5bl8CF1KhnhVLK9D44YxVrHi1ydEkhIsfgqWg c/PO3qVz+gLPyj/ppcCezCcc6CIvdAgB4Rk20=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QZRyAWntgV27ZkgnH1cRVVFnRTHdJDBD6OGBv7Owrqo=; b=liATtDcSCoheN0N4PwIaC+pZIR++QxkZLFNC5UQF7/zuegnlZLcgeTG8h9Zr4LAi/I 9jE0by1AG1t9g2dbF3ysDHGNxMxF57OALI82+4VlVy11UplakmN53urBkl1lKUV8UJ1i KKhY0m/BTlSS3pVGFOjeGpM24bGp6qNguyBAtGQ+ZOzVdehdMw38zTqiTGa5rCGeXrOw cHy/f+lDuVqnp0jF0Aja/UMKwpLJfGokZIFCuTW2tbMtPxlNbOEslML9S0xJ0avOXeAL NSvaN5RTlGJKYAu4czGgLqMbwj8Q3OhEj4kOu1NzfR68pds6+hRGPRQk86CwcDGhpiXX RHtw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533R/hb59cvnXCAM6yrlelk2L/rg5XI34QwFlVV4BBGotc+IEl/n zcqg1Smc8dtZHGNAZ+BotrydatrcvcjdDw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxY6FkqKLXTd5m4UhX7U9pcXPEYGPC5kWb+duVs3nG+modP3T553S/HlqXQJ/zPL0bb7GbVRQ==
X-Received: by 2002:aed:306f:: with SMTP id 102mr41581557qte.197.1625975138539; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 20:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-f173.google.com (mail-yb1-f173.google.com. [209.85.219.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a17sm4534311qkk.121.2021.07.10.20.45.38 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 10 Jul 2021 20:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-f173.google.com with SMTP id y38so22058707ybi.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 20:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:9bc6:: with SMTP id w6mr59018149ybo.159.1625975137720; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 20:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162596540685.23062.11654727411981880816@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALe60zArqmDB1SVkEna_h9gZ7MC=fsio==-Wsb5aJN5Oi-xUdQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxswQysOL2SCSKkYvzqWfD9v=mH=dzuYtJkXcU=kRovGHw@mail.gmail.com> <CALe60zDTJ0dGJBsdm3xdeNQgb_u1n20_3FJ-ueipzcFTjcF7VQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALe60zBQfM0v2N6j1FoGAZnKCSRFg8Ohu16WV4J16RTqnm09eg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALe60zBQfM0v2N6j1FoGAZnKCSRFg8Ohu16WV4J16RTqnm09eg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 23:45:26 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxu-mN=0nnpt4dvG0EA4O3Qj0SWLNL5RVjaPPhRxC1O_DA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxu-mN=0nnpt4dvG0EA4O3Qj0SWLNL5RVjaPPhRxC1O_DA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <justin@uberti.name>
Cc: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007f5e4105c6d0d6e1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/NyD7-BN7RGdj9d34CYdusH_nUeo>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2021 03:45:46 -0000

On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 11:35 PM Justin Uberti <justin@uberti.name> wrote:

> (To be clear, m= sections that are bundled will continue to be bundled and
> will not participate in the restart.)
>

This is what I thought.

How would one unbundle them if an offer needs to be generated for 3PCC
(like an offer in response to an empty INVITE)? There is the iceRestart
option for ICE to do this. Is there a need for something similar for the
bundle to do the same thing? Please see draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-04
section 7.6 (
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-04.html#section-7.6)
for more details.

Please note that in the case of 3PCC an offer within an existing session
for one call leg would be the initial offer for another call leg. After the
latest change, an offer within the existing session is no longer a valid
initial offer.

Thank You,
_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email